2007
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative transcriptome analysis of in vivo‐ and in vitro‐produced porcine blastocysts by small amplified RNA‐Serial analysis of gene expression (SAR‐SAGE)

Abstract: Production of embryos in vitro has enormous potential for research and commercial applications. Unfortunately, in vitro production of porcine embryos is extremely inefficient. Despite the characterization of distinct phenotypes, little is known about the molecular mechanisms and altered physiological processes of in vitro-produced embryos. The objective of this study was to compare global gene expression patterns from in vivo- (IVO) and in vitro-produced (IVP) porcine embryos using small amplified RNA-serial a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant differences in the experimental platforms, statistical analyses, and embryo stages might all be invoked as reasons behind this seeming discrepancy. In support of the suggestion that the experimental platform can have profound influences on experimental results even in very similarly conceived experimental designs, Miles et al (48) used serial analysis of gene expression to assess relative transcript abundance in porcine blastocysts and found Ͼ900 transcripts that were putatively differentially expressed in embryos generated in vitro vs. in vivo. Also, as the genes presented herein as differentially expressed are only those that were shown to be different across all gestation stages, it is highly unlikely that asynchrony between embryo types is responsible for the high number of aberrantly expressed genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences in the experimental platforms, statistical analyses, and embryo stages might all be invoked as reasons behind this seeming discrepancy. In support of the suggestion that the experimental platform can have profound influences on experimental results even in very similarly conceived experimental designs, Miles et al (48) used serial analysis of gene expression to assess relative transcript abundance in porcine blastocysts and found Ͼ900 transcripts that were putatively differentially expressed in embryos generated in vitro vs. in vivo. Also, as the genes presented herein as differentially expressed are only those that were shown to be different across all gestation stages, it is highly unlikely that asynchrony between embryo types is responsible for the high number of aberrantly expressed genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis should be further investigated but it is not unusual for genes that are involved with maintaining the integrity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (e.g. ATP5B and COX7B) to be downregulated in poor quality blastocysts compared with good quality blastocysts in the pig (Miles et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of in vivo developed to IVP pig blastocysts by small amplified RNA‐serial analysis evidenced 938 differentially expressed tag sequences, the majority of which were associated with cellular metabolism GO function (followed by cellular transport, regulation of physiological process, and signal transduction). Deeper analysis of metabolism‐involved differentially expressed transcripts evidenced a reduced oxidative phosphorylation in IVP blastocysts, so that defects in mitochondrial function and in energy production could be responsible for their reduced developmental ability (Miles et al, ). Focusing on the effect of in vitro culture only and comparing in vitro cultured to in vivo developed blastocysts obtained from the contralateral horn of the same artificially inseminated gilts, 1170 differentially expressed genes were identified, with an upregulation of genes involved in mRNA transcription, nucleotide and DNA metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism and a down‐regulation of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, proteolysis, protein glycosylation ATP binding, lipid, fatty acid and steroid metabolism (Bauer et al, ).…”
Section: Effects Of Art Process On Early Embryo Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%