2015
DOI: 10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Toxicities of Hydrastis Canadensis L., Berberis aristata DC. and Achillea millefolium L. Against Brine Shrimps (Artemia salina) Using Dosage Mortality Curve: A Probit Approach

Abstract: Hydrastis canadensis, Berberis aristata DC. and Achillea millefolium were compared for their toxicities against brine shrimps (Artemia salina). After applying statistical method of probits to the experimental data, H. canadensis was found to be the most toxic with the LC50 of 3.236 mg/ml, while, B. aristata showed moderate toxic potential showing that of 60.264 mg/ml and A. millefolium manifested the highest value, that is, 41297.5 mg/ml.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of the mentioned extracts, a significant mortality rate (more than 50% after 48 h), was showed the EA of A. grandifolia and ET of A. abrotanoides (LC50 values of 676.08 and 712.85 μg/mL, respectively). Examination of the toxicity of extracts of A. millefolium toward the nauplii of A. salina was the subject of other studies [33,34]. The acute toxicity of the chloroform extract of A. millefolium was proven [33], which is in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Table IVsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With the exception of the mentioned extracts, a significant mortality rate (more than 50% after 48 h), was showed the EA of A. grandifolia and ET of A. abrotanoides (LC50 values of 676.08 and 712.85 μg/mL, respectively). Examination of the toxicity of extracts of A. millefolium toward the nauplii of A. salina was the subject of other studies [33,34]. The acute toxicity of the chloroform extract of A. millefolium was proven [33], which is in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Table IVsupporting
confidence: 90%