1995
DOI: 10.1139/z95-258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative thermal ecology of the high-altitude lizard Sceloporus grammicus on the eastern slope of the Iztaccihuatl Volcano, Puebla, Mexico

Abstract: We studied the thermal ecology of Sceloporus grammicus occurring in very different thermal environments at 3700 and 4400 m elevation on the Iztaccihuatl Volcano, Mexico. Despite differences in the thermal environment between study sites, individual lizards maintained similar active body temperatures (around 31.5"C). Similar body temperatures at the two study sites probably result in differences in the cost of the thermoregulatory behavior. Lizards at the high-altitude site, an open area with few predators or c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns of smaller size-specific litters at higher altitudes relative to their lowland counterparts have been reported for populations of various lizard species (Waltner 1991;Mathies and Andrews 1995;Rohr 1997;Lemos-Espinal et al 1998). This phenomenon has been attributed to environmental conditions such as lower resource availability (Rohr 1997).…”
Section: Reproduction and Ecologysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar patterns of smaller size-specific litters at higher altitudes relative to their lowland counterparts have been reported for populations of various lizard species (Waltner 1991;Mathies and Andrews 1995;Rohr 1997;Lemos-Espinal et al 1998). This phenomenon has been attributed to environmental conditions such as lower resource availability (Rohr 1997).…”
Section: Reproduction and Ecologysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, sperm competition (Merilä and Sheldon 1998;Jolly and Phillips-Conroy 2001;Preston et al 2002;SchulteHostedde and Millar 2004;Hettyey and Roberts 2006), scramble competition polygyny (Clutton-Brock 1989;Davies 1991), the temporal and spatial distribution of the sexes (Davies 1991;Reynolds 1996) and the operational sex ratio of a species (Greenwood 1980;Hettyey and Roberts 2006) are also influential in determining intraspecific variation in reproductive biology. Such intraspecific geographic variation has been demonstrated in litter size (Hill 1972;Waltner 1991;Mathies and Andrews 1995;Rohr 1997;Lemos-Espinal et al 1998) and testicular size (Merilä and Sheldon 1998;Hettyey et al 2005) due to various ecological and biological factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean adult size of females vary from 44.5 to 55.2 mm snout-vent length (SVL), whereas minimum size at maturity ranges from 34.0 to 44.1 mm SVL among populations (Martínez 1985;Méndez-de la Cruz 1988;Ramírez-Bautista et al 2004). Mean litter size also exhibits considerable intraspecific variation from 3.3 to 6.2 young (Ortega and Barbault 1984;Guillette and Bearce 1986;Lemos-Espinal et al 1998). Body growth rates are faster at relatively low elevations when compared with those observed in populations at relatively high elevations (Lemos-Espinal and Ballinger 1995;Ortega-Rubio et al 1999b;Zúñiga-Vega et al 2008).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Lemos-Espinal et al (1997a) did not find a significant difference in T b between males and females, but did find significant differences in the environmental temperatures at the site of capture of males and females. Within Sceloporus, males with higher mean T b s than in females have been reported for S. scalaris and S .mucronatus (Lemos-Espinal et al 1997b, Smith et al 1993, with lower mean T b in S. undulatus erythrocheilus (Gillis 1991) and no difference in mean T b between males and females in a number of other species (e.g., Vial 1984, Guyer and Linder 1985, Lemos-Espinal and Ballinger 1995, LemosEspinal et al 1997c, 2001, 2003. Possible explanations for the differences in mean T b between and within sexes may include habitat partitioning for basking, activity at different times, or behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%