Comparative sustainable development in sub‐Saharan Africa

Abstract

Motivated by sustainable development challenges in sub‐Saharan Africa, this study assesses the comparative persistence of environmental unsustainability in a sample of 44 countries in the subregion for the period 2000–2012. The empirical evidence is based on Generalized Method of Moments. Of the six hypotheses tested, it is not feasible to assess the hypothesis on resource‐wealth because of issues in the degrees of freedom. For the remaining hypotheses, the following findings are established. (i) Hypothesis 1 postulating that middle‐income countries have a lower level of persistence in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is valid for CO2 per‐capita emissions, CO2 emissions from electricity and heat production and CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption. (ii) Hypothesis 2 that countries on the edge of French civil law is valid for CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption and CO2 intensity, but not for CO2 per‐capita emissions. (iii) Hypothesis 3 on the postulation that politically unstable countries reflect more persistence is valid for CO2 per‐capita emissions. (iv) Hypothesis 5 on the propensity for landlocked countries to be associated with more persistence in CO2 emissions is valid for CO2 per‐capita emissions but not for CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption. (v) Hypothesis 6 maintaining that Christianity‐dominated countries are more environmentally friendly with regard to CO2 emissions is valid for CO2 per‐capita emissions but not for CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption and CO2 intensity. Implications for policy and theory are discussed.

The Comparative African Economics of Governance in Fighting Terrorism

“…This is essentially because the ability of countries not affected by conflicts to use governance mechanisms in the fight against terrorism is significantly higher. In essence, politically-stable countries are likely to provide a more enabling environment for governance and economic development (Asongu, 2018). This narrative is consistent with Beegle et al (2016, p.10), who have argued that; state fragility is significantly linked with less development.…”

How Enhancing Information and Communication Technology Has Affected Inequality in Africa for Sustainable Development: An Empirical Investigation

“…The relationship between inequality and sustainable development is based on the fact that for inclusive development to be sustainable, it must be sustained and for sustained development to be sustainable, it should be inclusive (Amavilah et al, 2017). The positioning of the study also departs from the contemporary sustainable development literature which has focused on inter alia: the relationship between environmental degradation and inclusive human development (Asongu & Odhiambo, 2018b), linkages between economic progress and environmental sustainability in the light of conflicts (Fisher & Rucki, 2017); connections between beliefs that are normative and attitudes of individuals towards environmental welfare (Wang & Lin, 2017); the comparative importance of environmental sustainability (Asongu, 2018) and the relevance for planning in sustainable development outcomes (Saifulina & Carballo-Penela, 2017).…”

Basic formal education quality, information technology, and inclusive human development in sub‐Saharan Africa

“…The positioning of the study departs from recent sustainable development literature, which has largely focused on environmental sustainability, notably, nexuses between conflicts, economic development, and environmental sustainability (Fisher & Rucki, ); the importance of normative beliefs in environmental attitudes (Wang & Lin, ); and comparative literature on the sustainability of the environment (Asongu, b) and planning for enhanced sustainable development (Saifulina & Carballo‐Penela, ). It is also relevant to emphasize that the concept of inclusive human development used in this research is consistent with sustainable development in the perspective that, for inclusive development to be sustainable, it is supposed to be sustained, whereas for sustained development to be sustainable, it should be inclusive (Amavilah, Asongu, & Andrés, ; Asongu & Odhiambo, ).…”