2017
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201602046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study with a Unique Arrangement to Tap Piezoelectric Output to Realize a Self Poled PVDF Based Nanocomposite for Energy Harvesting Applications

Abstract: In this research paper we present a comparative study on the enhanced piezoelectric performance between Carbon Nanotubes (CNT)/PVDF nanocomposite as well as Iron-Reduced Graphene Oxide (Fe-RGO)/PVDF nanocomposite. The enhanced performance is realized by a unique device structure, in which the bottom electrode is physically not in contact with the piezoelectric film until external excitation is applied. FTIR characterization shows the enhancement of polar crystallization phases due to electrostatic interactions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates the presence of triple layer GO and triple layer Pd‐rGO nanosheets respectively. The result is consistent with previously reported works ,…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It indicates the presence of triple layer GO and triple layer Pd‐rGO nanosheets respectively. The result is consistent with previously reported works ,…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…nanosheets develop an electrical potential when exposed to mechanical stress. This potential further aligns the PVDF dipoles in the same direction by stress-induced polarization [133].…”
Section: Graphene and Reduced Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 74%
“…In 2017, Pusty et al . carried out a comparative study on the enhanced piezoelectric performance between CNT/PVDF nanocomposite and iron‐reduced graphene oxide (Fe‐RGO)/PVDF nanocomposite.…”
Section: Piezoelectric Polymers: a Productive Alternative To Piezo‐cementioning
confidence: 99%