Comparative Study to Evaluate the Intersystem Association and Reliability Between Standard Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Scoring System

Raizada, Nivedita; Mittal, Pratima; Suri, Jyotsna; Puri, Anurag; Sharma, Vivek

doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0537-0

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies by Manonai et al and Raizada et al showed better results (0.71 and 0.86 respectively). 11,13 There was excellent agreement for cervix (0.9) and posterior fornix (0.87) which is in congruent to the studies. 11,13 There was good agreement between the two classification systems of POP.…”

supporting

confidence: 83%

“…This has made its widespread acceptance and use limited by the practicing clinicians. [8][9][10][11] In response to this, International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Standardization of Terminology Committee has devised a simplified version of POPQ (S-POP) classification system that retains the ordinal stages of POP-Q system but simplifies terminology and reduces number of points measured, for easy translation into daily clinical practice. 12,13 Hence with this aim the present study was planned to determine the agreement between standard POPQ system and simplified POP scoring system and to propose a userfriendly scoring system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was little lower as compared to the studies by Raizada et al and Manonai et al POP affects all ages and have negatively impacts their quality of life. 2,11,13 102 (81.4%) had parity of third or higher order which is a well-known risk factor for POP. 13,14, 107 (85.6%) patients had history of home delivery which is similar to the results Ghumanga et al 15 119 women (95.2%) presented with symptom something coming out of vagina.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of intersystem agreement between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system

Singh

Choudhary

Ghanghoria

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is one of the most common gynaecological problem encountered worldwide. The POPQ has become the most commonly used prolapse staging system since its introduction (1996). In spite of having merits to it, POP-Q has not acquired a widespread acceptance. International Urogynaecological Association (IUGA) Standardization of Terminology Committee has devised a simplified version S-POP classification system based on the ordinal stages of the POPQ. The objectives of present study are to determine the intersystem agreement between the standard POPQ and S-POP classification system of pelvic organ prolapse and to propose a user-friendly classification system.Methods: This prospective observational blinded study was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NSCB Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur (M.P.) from March 2015-August 2016. 125 women underwent two separate pelvic examinations POPQ and S-POP, by two groups of gynaecologists at each site. Results were compared and analysed using appropriate statistics.Results: Out of 125 women 54 (43.2%) were in age group 41-50 years. 79 (63.2%) were post-menopausal. 102 (81.4%) were more than third parity. 107 (85.6%) had home delivery. 119 (95.2%) had symptom of something coming out of vagina. The weighted Kappa statistics for the intersystem agreement of S-POP system with POPQ system for overall stage was 0.82, 0.61 for both anterior and posterior vaginal wall, 0.9 for cervix and 0.87 for posterior fornix/cuff.Conclusions: There is significant agreement between the POPQ and S-POP classification systems of POP.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of intersystem agreement between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system

Singh

Choudhary

Ghanghoria

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The only problem with the POP-Q technique is its complexity for the beginners to understand and the time consumed for the total examination. A six-point simplified version of POP-Q was suggested by Raizada N et al as SPOP-Q [ 19 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of the Relationship Between Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Staging and Decubitus Ulcer in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Samantray¹,

Mohapatra

2021

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The protrusion of pelvic organs and their associated vaginal segments into or through the vagina is called pelvic organ prolapse (POP). One of the worrisome complications of POP is decubitus ulcer.It is a feature of old, long-standing prolapse. The standardized pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system of classification was proposed by the International Incontinence Society (ICS) for staging pelvic organ prolapse in 1996. This system is a clear and reproducible quantification method and has more inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. This study was designed to determine the relationship of the POP-Q stage with the presence and size of decubitus ulcer. Methods A total of 92 cases with pelvic organ prolapse were included in the study. We examined our patients by the POP-Q method and measured the dimension of the decubitus ulcer if present. Results Out of the 92 patients included in the study, 32 cases had a decubitus ulcer. As the POP-Q stage increased, the number of patients with a decubitus ulcer also increased. We also observed that larger dimension (>6 cm 2 ) decubitus ulcers are present in stage 3 and stage 4 POP. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the POP-Q stage and the size of the decubitus ulcer, r s =0.607, p<0.001. Conclusion A decubitus ulcer becomes more common as the POP-Q stage increases. The size of the ulcer also increases with the advancing stage of POP-Q.

show abstract

“…This system has shown good reliability, taking 9 points into consideration. However, the conventional system is found to be timeconsuming, difficult to learn and implement in daily practice, hence, a 6 point simplified version of POP-Q has been tried by Raizada Nivedita et al [9] which has given good correlation between POP-Q and SPOP-Q.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship of Decubitus Ulcer on Cervix in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with POP-Q Staging

Deshpande¹,

Madkar

Kiwalkar

2018

J Obstet Gynecol India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Intersystem Association and Reliability Between Standard Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Scoring System

Abstract: There is almost perfect intersystem agreement between the S-POP classification system and the standard POPQ classification system in respect of the overall stage as well as each point within the same system.

Cited by 10 publications

References 7 publications

Evaluation of intersystem agreement between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system

Evaluation of intersystem agreement between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system

Study of the Relationship Between Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Staging and Decubitus Ulcer in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Relationship of Decubitus Ulcer on Cervix in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with POP-Q Staging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About