Comparative Study on Uni- and Bi-Directional Fluid Structure Coupling of Wind Turbine Blades

Abstract

Abstract:The current trends of wind turbine blade designs are geared towards a longer and slender blade with high flexibility, exhibiting complex aeroelastic loadings and instability issues, including flutter; in this regard, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) plays a significant role. The present article will conduct a comparative study between uni-directional and bi-directional fluid-structural coupling models for a horizontal axis wind turbine. A full-scale, geometric copy of the NREL 5MW blade with simplified material distribution is considered for simulation. Analytical formulations of the governing relations with appropriate approximation are highlighted, including turbulence model, i.e., Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω. These analytical relations are implemented using Multiphysics package ANSYS employing Fluent module (Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-based solver) for the fluid domain and Transient Structural module (Finite Element Analysis-based solver) for the structural domain. ANSYS system coupling module also is configured to model the two fluid-structure coupling methods. The rated operational condition of the blade for a full cycle rotation is considered as a comparison domain. In the bi-directional coupling model, the structural deformation alters the angle of attack from the designed values, and by extension the flow pattern along the blade span; furthermore, the tip deflection keeps fluctuating whilst it tends to stabilize in the uni-directional coupling model.

Research on Wind Turbine Maintenance Based on Data-Physical Fusion Modeling

“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models investigate the flow field by solving the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations. In this paper, the Shear Stress Transport (SST) ݇ − ߱ model is used to simulate the turbulence model [11]. The SST ݇ − ߱ equation is…”

Aeroelastic Performance Analysis of Wind Turbine in the Wake with a New Elastic Actuator Line Model

“…Compared with the research by Meng et al [23], the part of aerodynamics solver is similar, but the way of dealing with structural solver is different (see Section 2.2). The advantages of this model are that the EALM allows large time step when the position of actuator line changes every time and computes long terms of wind Based on the beam theory, the curvature of principal axes κ 11 and κ 22 can be obtained from Equation (18) and Equation (19).…”

“…where EI is the stiffness of the blade element. Equation (18) and Equation (19) are converted back to direction 0 and direction 1 through the formulas as following:…”

Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling of Tidal Turbine Performance and Structural Loads in a Velocity Shear Environment

“…In order to develop a computationally efficient numerical model with acceptable accuracy, initially an FSI simulation with two-way data transfer was setup to simulate two rotations of the turbine because it was expected that the transient solution data for the 1st rotation would not be settled [17,20]. The current study requires settled solution data for at least one complete rotation of the turbine in both CFD and FEA modules.…”