2007
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the interaction of recombinant human soluble catechol‐O‐methyltransferase on some hydrophobic adsorbents

Abstract: The main scope of this work is the evaluation and potential application of hydrophobic interaction chromatography in the isolation of recombinant human soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase (hSCOMT) from an Escherichia coli cell extract. Therefore, a comparative study on the interaction of recombinant hSCOMT with different hydrophobic adsorbents (butyl-, octyl-, phenyl- and epoxy-Sepharose), was developed. The four adsorbents were evaluated in terms of selectivity, recovery and fractionation of recombinant hSCO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, with a mild hydrophobic ligand, such as epoxy (Tomaz et al, 2002), a higher selectivity was obtained in spite of the high and moderate adsorption and elution conditions, respectively (Table 1). This selective behavior was previously observed with other enzymes, namely cellulases (Tomaz et al, 2002) and human catechol-O-methyltransferase (Passarinha et al, 2007). Subsequently, we tested the effect of different salts (sodium sulfate, sodium phosphate and sodium citrate) that led to different ionic strengths (identical cation, different anion) and probably distinct separation degrees on the chromatographic step.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Nevertheless, with a mild hydrophobic ligand, such as epoxy (Tomaz et al, 2002), a higher selectivity was obtained in spite of the high and moderate adsorption and elution conditions, respectively (Table 1). This selective behavior was previously observed with other enzymes, namely cellulases (Tomaz et al, 2002) and human catechol-O-methyltransferase (Passarinha et al, 2007). Subsequently, we tested the effect of different salts (sodium sulfate, sodium phosphate and sodium citrate) that led to different ionic strengths (identical cation, different anion) and probably distinct separation degrees on the chromatographic step.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…1b, when the three columns were first equilibrated with 2 M ammonium sulfate, no binding was verified in any stationary phase. Nevertheless, the high concentrations of ammonium sulfate commonly used in these assays have a negative impact on COMT biological activity [24], a major drawback when developing suitable MBCOMT purification strategies. Therefore, after evaluating these three supports (l-histidine agarose, l-argininesepharose 4B gel and l-methionine agarose), we observed that l-arginine gel demonstrated high selectivity for the MBCOMT purification from P. pastoris lysates, mostly using an increasing gradient of sodium chloride.…”
Section: Selection Of the Amino Acid Stationary Phase For Mbcomt Isolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a 4 h growth at 37°C, cells were harvested by centrifugation and suspended in a standard buff er . After bacterial lysis, a 10 mL supernatant sample was obtained and injected directly into the hydrophobic supports as previously described (Passarinha et al, 2007).…”
Section: Recombinant Hscomt Expression and Recuperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these procedures leading to low percentage of COMT recovery due to the removal of the fusion peptide, the method allows the purifi cation of the rat enzyme in suffi cient amounts for crystallization and structure-function studies . More recently, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), a powerful technique in modern biotechnology for the downstream processing of several biomolecules (Queiroz et al, 2001), was emerging as an effi cient method for hSCOMT isolation (Passarinha et al, 2007). Specifi cally, typical elution conditions by stepwise gradients of AS from 0.6 to 0 M guarantee intermediate purifi cation and a suitable hSCOMT-capturing step from cell culture supernatant, ensuring that the enzyme retains its native conformation and biological activity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%