2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-915x2015000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on porosity and permeability of conventional concrete and concrete with variable proportions of natural zeolite additions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The porosity values could be due the aggregates size fraction of SA utilized in this study with porosities of 12 and 19%. Normal values for conventional concrete porosity range between 9 and 10% [60]. Tamayo et al [33] presented similar porosity and absorption results with 100% replacement of EAFS.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Hardened Concretementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The porosity values could be due the aggregates size fraction of SA utilized in this study with porosities of 12 and 19%. Normal values for conventional concrete porosity range between 9 and 10% [60]. Tamayo et al [33] presented similar porosity and absorption results with 100% replacement of EAFS.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Hardened Concretementioning
confidence: 86%
“…It penetrates into porous media, transports harmful substances and freezes inside. When a homogeneous porous material has a constant hydraulic potential at its wet surface, liquid can reach the significant heights and depths due to the absorption-ability (Hanžič and Ilić, 2003;De La Cruz et al, 2015). The variation of the water absorption of PCIBs with fly ash ratio is presented in Figure 17 for all the different type of cure condition.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeolite has also been used to improve the performance of concrete (e.g. Janotka & Mojumdar, 2003;de la Cruz, del Campo & Colorado, 2015;Raggiotti, Positieri, Locati, Murra & Marfil, 2015;Ramirez, Chagoyén & Martirena, 2017) and asphalt (e.g. Alonso, Tejeda, Moreno, Rubio & Medel, 2013).…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%