Comparative study on life cycle assessment of components produced by additive and conventional manufacturing process

Swetha, Rachala; Krishna, L. Siva Rama; Kiran, B. Hari Sai; Reddy, P. Ravinder; Venkatesh, Sriram

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.840

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The resulting is called the "green part", which should be de-binded and cured later to increase its strength. Sintering into a furnace gives the final strength also to reduce porosity and improves its dimensional accuracy, density, and mechanical properties [2], [4]. Figure 2 illustrates the steps of the BJ technology process.…”

Section: Process Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AM technologies are the best ways to manufacture geometries with complex features in most metallic alloys or refractory materials that cannot be obtained by traditional methods. Many studies have been done making comparisons about the life cycle between AM and traditional methods [2]. The conclusion is, AM technology has many merits in reducing manufacturing time which leads to reduce cost as well because of reducing manufacturing procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Binder jetting additive manufacturing comparative study

Abdelkhalek

2023

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This comparative study aims to analyze the most relevant literature regarding Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing (BJAM) process. The paper starts with section one to briefly introduce the process. Section two of the paper presents an overview of the technology; the main advantages and shortcomings are also addressed. Then, the materials that are mostly employed in BJ are introduced. In section four, the most important design considerations that must be taken into account in this process are presented. Section five of the paper compares the BJ systems available nowadays. Some relevant examples of components and geometries that can be created with this technology are presented next with special emphasis on applications for high-tech industries. Then, the main challenges and limitations along with the prospects of the BJ process are discussed. Finally, the main conclusions extracted from the literature review conducted are listed.

show abstract

Section: Process Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Binder jetting additive manufacturing comparative study

Abdelkhalek

2023

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Landi et al, (2022) analysed and compared the environmental impacts of an AM technology with a subtractive CM, using primary data obtained from direct measurements in the production process of spur gears made of steel alloy, obtaining advantages for the AM process, but pointing out that it is still an experimental technology with a lower maturity level than its counterpart. A comparative gate-to-gate LCA was carried out on a softwaresimulated AM process and a CM industrial method, by Swetha et al, (2022),…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%