2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on fire resistance and zero strength layer thickness of CLT floor under natural fire and standard fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exposed surface temperatures decay steadily but slowly due to the furnace enclosure and at 240 mins range from 120 o C to 350 o C (see Figure 6). Zeng et al [16] completed experiments on 3 and 5 ply CLT floors, exposing them to both standard and a simulated natural fire. In-depth CLT temperatures were recorded through the decay period for some of the experiments.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposed surface temperatures decay steadily but slowly due to the furnace enclosure and at 240 mins range from 120 o C to 350 o C (see Figure 6). Zeng et al [16] completed experiments on 3 and 5 ply CLT floors, exposing them to both standard and a simulated natural fire. In-depth CLT temperatures were recorded through the decay period for some of the experiments.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, unprotected steel undergoes a rapid reduction in strength upon exposure to increased temperatures [25]. When examining homogeneous glulam beams (crafted from a single wood species), investigations into the thermal characteristics and properties influencing combustion can be approached similarly to solid wood analyses [26]. However, the combination of different wood species within a glulam assembly presents distinct challenges, primarily due to variations in the anatomical structure, physical properties, and differing thermal expansion exhibited by each wood species [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is still room for a solution consisting of solid and completely pure wood, dovetail wood board elements (DWBEs) [23]. Numerous studies have been conducted in the literature on the technological, ecological, and economic aspects of EWPs in construction with different building solutions [24] such as [25][26][27][28][29][30], and there is limited understating of DWBEs, which mostly includes structural analysis of connection details (e.g., [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]). Here, the dovetail wood board elements (DWBEs) can be defined as solid/massive and pure wood structural elements such as floor Engineered Wood Products for Construction 4 slabs that use plug-in dovetail form in the joint detail and do not use adhesives and metal connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%