2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-010-0108-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study on Calculation Methods of Blasting Vibration Velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the blasting parameters are unreasonably designed, closed microcracks are generally produced in hard rock mass; therefore, microcracks are generally developed along the joints and fractures adjacent to presplit blast holes in soft and crushed rock masses, so that the structural plane of a rock mass is seriously damaged, allowing the appearance of damage induced by back impact after the blasting of adjacent blast holes. erefore, it is necessary to design the presplit blasting parameters according to the mechanism underpinning presplit blasting while considering the influences of factors such as behaviour of explosive and the physicomechanical properties of the rock mass [35,36].…”
Section: Parameter Design For Presplit Blastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the blasting parameters are unreasonably designed, closed microcracks are generally produced in hard rock mass; therefore, microcracks are generally developed along the joints and fractures adjacent to presplit blast holes in soft and crushed rock masses, so that the structural plane of a rock mass is seriously damaged, allowing the appearance of damage induced by back impact after the blasting of adjacent blast holes. erefore, it is necessary to design the presplit blasting parameters according to the mechanism underpinning presplit blasting while considering the influences of factors such as behaviour of explosive and the physicomechanical properties of the rock mass [35,36].…”
Section: Parameter Design For Presplit Blastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodev's empirical formula has been demonstrated by most engineering tests and is widely used because of the high accuracy of the predicted particle velocity of blasting vibrations at ground level, under flat terrain conditions [12][13][14][15]. The accuracy of this formula is poor when the blasting environment is complex and the topography of the blasting site changes greatly.…”
Section: Shock and Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of analysis results of measured data indicate that PPV can be expressed as a function of charge weight ( ), distance from blasting center ( ), rock and soil properties along traveling path of blasting wave and conditions at measuring points [15]. The widely used Sodev's formula is as follow:…”
Section: Analysis On Ppvmentioning
confidence: 99%