Comparative Study on Anti-VEGF in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Setting Based on Lean Methodology from the Bari Intravitreal Injection Registry (BIVIR)

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing treatment protocols for wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) is an ongoing challenge, as it involves a delicate balance between achieving therapeutic efficacy and minimizing invasive procedures' frequency. This study aimed to apply the Lean methodology and evaluate the effectiveness of this new setting on intravitreal therapy for wAMD, employing different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) drugs (bevacizumab, brolucizumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab), drawing data from the Bari Intravitreal Injections Registry (BIVIR).Methods: This was a retrospective, monocentric, nonrandomized, comparative study. Lean methodology was employed to design the new setting and the BIVIR collected information from electronic medical records. Clinical data of four groups, stratified based on the first-line anti-VEGF agents used, were compared. Bestcorrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) changes were compared between the four groups at 3 and 12 months. Results: Out of 4990 eyes and 41,323 intravitreal injections (IVs) recorded in BIVIR, 1421 eyes of 1182 patients were included. The mean number of IVs in first year was 6.1 ± 2.5, with no significant differences among the four subgroups. The mean change in BCVA was ? 6.2 letters [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-6.8] after two IVs, and ? 5.9 (95% CI 5.1-6.8) letters after three IVs; at three months, brolucizumab was associated with a greater mean increase in BCVA than bevacizumab (p = 0.050); aflibercept (p = 0.044) and ranibizumab p = 0.047). At the 1-year follow-up, the mean change was ? 6.3 letters (95% CI 5.4-7.2), brolucizumab and ranibizumab were associated with a superior improvement in BCVA compared to aflibercept (p = 0.033). Regarding the CRT, a significant reduction was observed in the subgroup treated with brolucizumab at the 3-month follow-up, compared to bevacizumab (p = 0.003), aflibercept (p = 0.015), and ranibizumab (p \ 0.001); Aflibercept exhibited a superior effect than