1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9150(81)90102-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on age-related changes and atherosclerotic involvement of the coronary arteries of male and female subjects up to 40 years of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These gaps are more numerous in the caudal artery than in the renal artery, suggesting the influence of local factors, and are more numerous in the male than in the female. Such a sex difference has been reported by Velican and Velican [1981] concerning the age-related alterations in the IEL in the human coronary artery, and to a lesser extent by Winter et al [1979] in the human external iliac artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These gaps are more numerous in the caudal artery than in the renal artery, suggesting the influence of local factors, and are more numerous in the male than in the female. Such a sex difference has been reported by Velican and Velican [1981] concerning the age-related alterations in the IEL in the human coronary artery, and to a lesser extent by Winter et al [1979] in the human external iliac artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In a necropsy study, normal intimal thickness (not including media) averaged 0.21 mm (0.10 to 0.28 mm) in 21-to 25-year-old subjects, 0.22 mm (0.12 to 0.28 mm) in 26-to 30-year-old subjects, and 0.25 mm (0.18 to 0.35 mm) in 36-to 40-year-old subjects. 34 Similarly, in a comparative ultrasound-histology study, patients with no known coronary artery disease, intimal thickness (without including media) was 0.24Ϯ0.11 mm. 35 In this study, the medial thickness was 0.23Ϯ0.6 mm and did not vary significantly with intimal proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4.1 lists the dimensions of these two constituent layers of a typical Left Anterior Descending (LAD) coronary artery wall for both a healthy and a diseased artery as reported in [53]. The values in parentheses are the averages of all the thickness data taken from histomorphological studies referred to in [54]. Since the thickness of the intima and media vary widely with age, gender, disease condition and stage, etc., it is very difficult to select a representative idealized artery wall model.…”
Section: Time Integration and Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%