2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of TL and OSL properties of LSO and LSO:Ce single crystals and single crystalline films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existence of differences in thermoluminescent properties of LSO SC and SCF counterparts was reported in our previous work [11]. We showed that thermoluminescence glow curves strongly depend on crystalline form of the SC and SCF samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Existence of differences in thermoluminescent properties of LSO SC and SCF counterparts was reported in our previous work [11]. We showed that thermoluminescence glow curves strongly depend on crystalline form of the SC and SCF samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The most common TL detectors are those based on lithium fluoride [ 32 , 33 ], but new materials and new applications are still under development [ 34 ]. In the past, some types of thin-film TL detectors for measurements of weakly penetrating radiation [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] have been developed. Recently, we have also studied the possibility of using LPE-grown SCFs of oxide compounds (perovskites, garnets, orthosilicates) for this purpose [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works [11][12][13], we also studied the thermoluminescence (TL) properties of Ce 3+ -doped LSO and YSO SCFs grown by the LPE method from PbO-B 2 O 3 flux. We have shown that the LSO:Ce and YSO:Ce SCFs exhibit unexpected strong thermoluminescent signal above room temperature (RT) [11][12][13]. Such promising results led us to further research in this subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our last works [11][12][13], we assumed that the formation of such trapping centers in LSO:Ce and YSO:Ce SCFs is related to the use of PbO-based flux and Pt mounting for the crystallization of these films. The nature of these traps is mainly caused by the presence of Pb 2+ (from flux) and Pt 4+ (from crucible) contaminations in these SCF samples and the formation of different local charge and volume compensated lattice defects, such as the oxygen or cation vacancies around the mentioned impurities, which can act as trapping centers in the TL of these SCFs [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%