1979
DOI: 10.1049/piee.1979.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of three methods for computing electric fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malik reviewed the CSM application, and modified it by using the least square method to minimize the errors [8]. It has been shown that for insulators that are rotationally symmetric, CSM has certain advantages over other numerical methods in terms of computational complexity [9]. However, on wet surfaces, the discrete water droplets on the insulator are not symmetric, and hence, have to be modeled in three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malik reviewed the CSM application, and modified it by using the least square method to minimize the errors [8]. It has been shown that for insulators that are rotationally symmetric, CSM has certain advantages over other numerical methods in terms of computational complexity [9]. However, on wet surfaces, the discrete water droplets on the insulator are not symmetric, and hence, have to be modeled in three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate interpretation was investigated by imagining two parallel cylinders to be appoximated by several overlapping spheres as shown in figure 10. The interaction of each pair of spheres (one from each cylinder) approximately represents the interaction of different sections of the Darallel cylinders.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCM has always been programmed for three dimensional problems but it is not as popular because it gives only an estimate of the field and is slow if accurate calculations are required at a large number of points. More recently, a number of attempts have been made to solve general three dimensional problems [10,11,12]. In each case there have been difficulties with long set up times, and large memory and computation time requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tortschanoff [27] discussed the field equations for eddy current problems and compared the FEM and FDM by using different solution tech niques to solve the system of equations. Beasley et al [28] tested the Monte Carlo method, FEM, and the charge simulation method for calculating electrostatic fields and potential. Krawczyk and Turkowski [29] stressed the necessity for choosing the technique that would satisfy the needs of the problem in the most efficient manner.…”
Section: Chapter 2 Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%