2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.029
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the wear of the pair human teeth/Vita Enamic® vs commonly used dental ceramics through chewing simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A tribolayer is formed mainly on the enamel surface, by agglomeration and compaction of the wear debris from the two opposing surfaces. This was not observed in a posterior study, from the same research group, where, instead of a pin-on-plate apparatus, a chewing simulator was used [ 28 ]. In fact, in this case, the wear particles remain less time between the contacting surfaces, reducing the possibility of formation of such compact protective tribolayer on the dental surface.…”
Section: Wear At the Interface Of Occlusal Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A tribolayer is formed mainly on the enamel surface, by agglomeration and compaction of the wear debris from the two opposing surfaces. This was not observed in a posterior study, from the same research group, where, instead of a pin-on-plate apparatus, a chewing simulator was used [ 28 ]. In fact, in this case, the wear particles remain less time between the contacting surfaces, reducing the possibility of formation of such compact protective tribolayer on the dental surface.…”
Section: Wear At the Interface Of Occlusal Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santos et al [ 28 ] compared the wear performance of some ceramic dental materials (zirconia, leucite and zirconia veneered) when tested against natural teeth and concluded that zirconia led to the lowest wear on both occlusal surfaces ( Figure 4 A,B). On the other hand, leucite and zirconia Veneered induced the highest teeth wear.…”
Section: Wear At the Interface Of Occlusal Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a number of limitations were identified in oral tribology, as compared with joint tribology. Simple experimental set-ups with simple configurations were often adopted to simulate chewing mechanics [387,456], while more complex and sophisticated joint simulators were developed as discussed in joint tribology.…”
Section: Oral Tribologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidental wear facets are not usually a primary concern to dentists, but pathological wear from clenching and grinding (bruxing) can lead to sensitivity, loss of function and esthetics, and infection, especially once the dentin is exposed. Wear rates depend on material microstructures and bite force (Borrero-Lopez et al, 2014), among several other tribological and clinical factors (Lambrechts et al, 1989;Kelly, 1997;Lewis and Dwyer-Joyce, 2005;Kraemer et al, 2006;Heintze et al, 2008;Zhou and Zheng, 2008;d'Incau et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2012;Mitov et al, 2012;Janyavula et al, 2013;Preis et al, 2013;Stober et al, 2014;Dupriez et al, 2015;Stober et al, 2016;Matzinger et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2018). Dental materials with a ceramic component tend to be relatively hard, leading in extreme cases to accelerated antagonistic wear of opposing dentition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%