2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the thermal performance of four different shell-and-tube heat exchangers used as latent heat thermal energy storage systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…And the compact finned-tube system presented a satisfactory overall performance compared to other published results. Gasia et al [22] compared the performance of TES in four systems including the addition of fins and the use of two different HTF. The results revealed that the finned designs showed an improvement of up to 40% for the same HTF, and water showed results up to 44% higher than silicone for the same design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the compact finned-tube system presented a satisfactory overall performance compared to other published results. Gasia et al [22] compared the performance of TES in four systems including the addition of fins and the use of two different HTF. The results revealed that the finned designs showed an improvement of up to 40% for the same HTF, and water showed results up to 44% higher than silicone for the same design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the charging power and error curve with time of the multichannel flat tube phase change TSU during the charging process (inlet temperature: 65°C, airflow: 100 m 3 /h, initial temperature of the unit: 30°C). Normalized power involves setting the instantaneous peak power of each design to 1 . During the initial stage, the temperature difference between air and lauric acid decreased, and heat storage power decreased with a rapid increase in lauric acid temperature due to sensible heat absorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalized power involves setting the instantaneous peak power of each design to 1. 23 During the initial stage, the temperature difference between air and lauric acid decreased, and heat storage power decreased with a rapid increase in lauric acid temperature due to sensible heat absorption. Afterward, lauric acid started to absorb latent heat and phase changes, and temperature remained stable for a long time with the stability of heat storage power.…”
Section: Energy Storage and Release During The Charging/dischargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, numerous experimental studies on the thermal performance of LHTES units have been conducted [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, a limited number of the experimental studies have been reported that focus on building heating applications on a full scale [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental rig was also simulated by CFD and the results extracted were used to understand the process duration and the effect of the HTF flow rate along with the heat transfer mechanism acting in both melting and solidification processes considering the requirements for a heating application [15]. Gasia et al [13] experimentally tested and compared in four LHTES systems the addition of fins and the use of two different HTFs based on the shell-and-tube heat exchanger concept, using paraffin RT58 as phase change material. Results indicate that finned designs show an improvement of up to 40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%