2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the prevalence of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes in cone beam computed tomograms of patients with or without temporomandibular disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presented study, there were no significant differences regarding the age among the examined groups. Similar results were obtained by Walewski et al [33] and Al-Ekrish et al [34]. Nonetheless, Alexiou et al [29] confirmed that osteoarthritic changes were related to age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the presented study, there were no significant differences regarding the age among the examined groups. Similar results were obtained by Walewski et al [33] and Al-Ekrish et al [34]. Nonetheless, Alexiou et al [29] confirmed that osteoarthritic changes were related to age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A recent study on TMD symptoms in knee arthritis patients and non-arthritic controls reported that arthritic patients were more likely to experience temporomandibular joint dysfunction and limited range of motion [ 26 ], and joint space narrowing and osteophyte formation were observed in the temporomandibular joint in generalized osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients [ 27 ]. However, osteoarthritic change of the temporomandibular joint and TMD symptoms do not always go hand in hand [ 28 ]. Prevalence of osseous changes resembling temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis was shown to be similar in both groups with and without TMD symptoms [ 29 ], indicating that radiological test results do not necessarily correlate with clinical symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because in in vivo studies, it is difficult to know the corresponding reality of bone changes if a real patient is examined, and thus, there is no gold standard for reference. This directly affects the calculations of the sensitivity, specificity and ROC curve 14 15 16 17 , which are essential for a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%