2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(01)00496-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the molecular structure of stilbene using molecular mechanics, Hartree–Fock and density functional theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly distorted dihedral angle of 26.7 • for stilbene molecule (PPV1) was also obtained with the MP2/6-31G** method. 10 This is in agreement with the electron diffraction experiment where the nonplanar stilbene structure (31 • ±5 • ) 11 was described. In contrast, the density functional theory (DFT) 12 in several basis sets and semiempirical parametric method 3 (PM3) 13 calculations favor the nearly or totally planar structures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly distorted dihedral angle of 26.7 • for stilbene molecule (PPV1) was also obtained with the MP2/6-31G** method. 10 This is in agreement with the electron diffraction experiment where the nonplanar stilbene structure (31 • ±5 • ) 11 was described. In contrast, the density functional theory (DFT) 12 in several basis sets and semiempirical parametric method 3 (PM3) 13 calculations favor the nearly or totally planar structures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Noticeable discrepancies, up to 15°, are observed between the MP2 (Table 1) and the DFT (Tables 2 and 3) transition states for the C β ‐C α ‐S α ‐C 1 , C α ‐S α ‐C 1 ‐S 1 , and C 1 ‐S 1 ‐C β ‐C α dihedral angles. Again, in straightforward analogy with recent studies of the ground‐state structure of trans ‐stilbene,33, 34 it appears that the DFT/B3LYP and MPW1K methods more strongly drive the transition state toward planarity compared with the MP2 level. In comparison with the MP2 level, the DFT(MPW1K) and DFT(B3LYP) methods also provide systematically a significantly longer C α S α bond (by ≈0.1 and ≈0.2 Å, respectively) and shorter C β H β bond (by ≈0.03 and ≈0.04 Å, respectively) in the transition state.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Theoretical Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The MD computations have been performed using the 3.1 version of the TINKER package of programs 57 together with the MM3(92) force field 47–49. This force field has been preferred to a more recent MM3(96) version because in the particular case of tS the calculated geometries are slightly better when compared to the results of DFT 58–60 calculations 61 carried out with the B3LYP functional 62, 63 in conjunction with Dunning's cc‐pVDZ basis set 64, an approach which in turn compares favorably well with benchmark calculations at the CCSD(T) level 65–68. Compared also with elements of the B3LYP/cc‐pVD2 potential energy surface, such as the dependence of the total energy on the C 1 –C 2 –C 3 –C 4 dihedral angle about the C 2 –C 3 single bond (in short, ϕ, see Fig.…”
Section: Theory and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%