2007
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2006.098160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the intestinal mucus barrier in normal and inflamed colon

Abstract: Aim: To study the role of mucus in the spatial separation of intestinal bacteria from mucosa. Patients and methods: Mucus barrier characteristics were evaluated using histological material obtained by biopsy from purged colon, colon prepared with enema and material from untreated appendices fixed with non-aqueous Carnoy solution. Bacteria were evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization, with bacterial 16S RNA probes and related to the periodic acid Schiff alcian blue stain. Biopsies from controls (n = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
234
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
234
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to bacterial pathogen infection, this mechanism might also be relevant to restrict commensal bacteria translocation through the intestinal epithelium. Given that the mucus layer is reduced during inflammation (Swidsinski et al , 2007) and thus more bacteria are probing the epithelial surface, it is conceivable that the depletion of membrane rafts limits the docking of such bacteria and their potential translocation through the intestinal barrier. Indeed, commensal bacteria have been shown to exploit membrane raft‐mediated transcellular pathways to cross the intestinal epithelium, in mechanisms dependent (Kalischuk et al , 2009) or independent (Clark et al , 2005) of co‐infection with bacterial pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to bacterial pathogen infection, this mechanism might also be relevant to restrict commensal bacteria translocation through the intestinal epithelium. Given that the mucus layer is reduced during inflammation (Swidsinski et al , 2007) and thus more bacteria are probing the epithelial surface, it is conceivable that the depletion of membrane rafts limits the docking of such bacteria and their potential translocation through the intestinal barrier. Indeed, commensal bacteria have been shown to exploit membrane raft‐mediated transcellular pathways to cross the intestinal epithelium, in mechanisms dependent (Kalischuk et al , 2009) or independent (Clark et al , 2005) of co‐infection with bacterial pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing mechanical protection, they present bactericide properties 7,8 . Breakage of the protective barrier or mucus, as occurs in inflammatory intestinal diseases, allows invasion of bacteria through the epithelial surface 7,8,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental model was chosen because we believed that intestinal diversion through the use of loop colostomies would not ensure complete exclusion of the fecal stream 6 . With the aim of ensuring that the experimental model adopted would be capable of causing inflammation to appear in the colon mucosa of the segments excluded from the transit, we preferred to use an inflammation grading scale that had previously been validated 19 . This allowed the main histological changes encountered to be considered together 19,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alterations in the intestinal mucus layer have been reported in various intestinal disorders (Shirazi et al, 2000;Einerhand et al, 2002;Swidsinski et al, 2007). Reduced mucus thickness, altered glycosylation, and decreased sulfation together with depleted goblet cells have been reported in inflammatory bowel disease and ulcerative colitis (Badr-el-Din et al, 1988;Einerhand et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%