Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive

Jh, Jang; Lee, Myoung Geun; Woo, Sang Uk; Lee, Chung Ok; Yi, Jin-Kyu; Kim, Duck-Su

doi:10.4012/dmj.2015-422

Cited by 44 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jang et al reported that very hydrophobic character of All-Bond Universal might enhance its adhesive performance for both application modes. According to their results, Single Bond Plus has demonstrated lower bond strength values than Clearfil SE and All-Bond Universal [35]. In the present study, there was no significant difference between the bond strength values of adhesive systems used.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 38%

Effect of Laser Conditioning and Different Adhesive Strategies on Bond Strength of a Bulk Fill and a Microhybrid Resin Composite

Özduman¹,

Tuncer²,

Çelik³

et al. 2018

IJDSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the effect of laser conditioning and adhesive strategies on bond strength of a bulk fill and a microhybrid resin composite. Methods: 96 human posterior teeth's buccal and lingual surfaces were ground flat to expose dentin surfaces with standard smear layer (N=192). The specimens were divided into 16 experimental groups according to (1) Laser-conditioning (Laser-etched group/control group); (2) Adhesive strategies (etch&rinse, Adper Single Bond2(SB2), two step self-etch ClearfilSE Bond(CSE), multi-mode adhesive All-Bond Universal with self-etching technique(ABU-SE), or etch&rinse technique(ABU-ER); (3) Restorative materials (Z250/SDR). All the restorative applications were applied according to the manufacturer's directions. The specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24 hours. The specimens were placed on a shear bond test machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The values were recorded at the time of failure of composite resins. The bond strength values for shear forces were reported in MPa and derived by dividing the imposed force at the time of fracture by the bonded area. The failed samples were examined under a streomicroscope at X20 magnification to determine the mode of failure. The data were statistically analyzed with three-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were made by Bon Ferroni test at 5% significance level (p<0.05). Results: SDR and Z250 yielded statistically significant difference when bonded with ABU-ER without laser conditioning (p=0.008). The predominant mode of failure was mixed type. Conclusion: Laser conditioning did not affect shear bond strength values of a bulk fill and a microhybrid resin composites regardless of adhesive system.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 38%

Effect of Laser Conditioning and Different Adhesive Strategies on Bond Strength of a Bulk Fill and a Microhybrid Resin Composite

Özduman¹,

Tuncer²,

Çelik³

et al. 2018

IJDSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A previous study has reported that universal adhesives show higher dentin bond strength than two‐step self‐etch adhesives . By contrast, other studies found either no significant difference or that the two‐step self‐etch adhesives was higher than universal adhesives in dentin bond strength . Therefore, the relative dentin bond strength of universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives is still a controversial topic and further work is necessary to elucidate differences in the bonding performance of universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives.…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode

Tsujimoto

Barkmeier

Takamizawa

et al. 2017

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This aim of this study was to compare universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Three universal adhesives - Clearfil Universal, G-Premio Bond, and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive - and three-two-step self-etch adhesives - Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil SE Bond 2, and OptiBond XTR - were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of resin composite bonded to adhesive on dentin in self-etch mode were determined. Scanning electron microscopy observations of fracture surfaces after bond strength tests were also made. The initial shear bond strength of universal adhesives was material dependent, unlike that of two-step self-etch adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive was not significantly different from that of two-step self-etch adhesives, unlike the other universal adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives differed depending on the type of adhesive, unlike those of two-step self-etch adhesives. The results of this study encourage the continued use of two-step self-etch adhesive over some universal adhesives but suggest that changes to the composition of universal adhesives may lead to a dentin bond fatigue durability similar to that of two-step self-etch adhesives.

show abstract

“…However, in this study, the hybrid layer and underlying dentin substrate were not chemically altered with aging treatment, possibly due to the usage mode of the dentin adhesive. Generally, the hybrid layer is thicker in the etch-and-rinse mode than in the self-etch mode using the same universal adhesive 29) . Moreover, the self-etch dentin adhesive did not eliminate but rather modified the smear layer; thus, the hybrid layer produced from the self-etch mode, as opposed to the etch-and-rinse mode, included more inorganic substrates.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive

Jang

Jeon

et al. 2019

Dent. Mater. J.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluates the effects of various agitation methods on the adhesive layer formation of a new HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive. The µTBS of the universal adhesive, G-Premio BOND in the self-etch mode was evaluated using three agitation methods [passive agitation (PA), active agitation (AA), ultrasonic agitation (UA)], with and without aging treatment. Two-way analysis of variance revealed that aging treatment was not a statistically significant factor. Tukey's HSD test showed significant differences based on the application method, UA>AA>PA. TEM images of the PA group revealed multiple water blisters in the adhesive layers; AA and UA groups presented significantly less or no blisters within the adhesive layers; thus, AA and UA groups exhibited better bonding performance for the HEMA-free universal adhesive. It is assumed that the entrap ped blisters can be reduced with the active application of dentin adhesive, and thus improving the bonding performance.

show abstract

Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive

Cited by 44 publications

References 24 publications

Effect of Laser Conditioning and Different Adhesive Strategies on Bond Strength of a Bulk Fill and a Microhybrid Resin Composite

Effect of Laser Conditioning and Different Adhesive Strategies on Bond Strength of a Bulk Fill and a Microhybrid Resin Composite

Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode

Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About