1998
DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.5.1195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of the Clinical Presentation of Legionella Pneumonia and Other Community-Acquired Pneumonias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
1
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
91
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Some validated commercial MIF kits [17,18] have been used by many clinical laboratories and researchers [11,17,[19][20][21]. Laboratorial diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection in our study was established on the basis of a significant and clear-cut antibody response by MIF test as reported [11] and recommended [5]; we use seroconversion as criterium of definite acute infection as others [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some validated commercial MIF kits [17,18] have been used by many clinical laboratories and researchers [11,17,[19][20][21]. Laboratorial diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection in our study was established on the basis of a significant and clear-cut antibody response by MIF test as reported [11] and recommended [5]; we use seroconversion as criterium of definite acute infection as others [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Western countries, Legionella pneumophila is, according to most studies, among the three most common causes of community-acquired pneumonia and it is the second-highest cause of severe pneumonia (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study (14) univariate analysis showed that CAP by LP was more frequent in middle-aged, healthy male patients than CAP by another etiology. Moreover, the lack of response to previous -lactamic drugs, headache, diarrhea, severe hyponatremia, and elevation in serum CK levels on presentation were more frequent in NLCAP by LCAP, while cough, expectoration, and thoracic pain were more frequent in NLCAP by another bacterial etiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Variables studied: For analysis we considered the most predictive variables (table I) according to a previous study (14): (1) demographic variables: age, sex ; (2) risk factors: smoking, chronic alcoholism; underlying disease, including COPD, HIV infection, solid or hematologic neoplasm; pharmacologic immunosuppression (steroids and chemotherapy); (3) variables of clinical presentation: cough, expectoration, thoracic pain, headache, confusion, diarrhea and antibiotic treatment with beta-lactamic drugs prior to pneumonia; (4) analytical data: sodium (Na), creatine kinase (CK) and glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%