Impact-2013 2013
DOI: 10.1109/mspct.2013.6782100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of techniques for brain tumor segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A frequent question in digital cell counting is how a protocol rationalizes occluded cells or groups of cells with indistinguishable borders. Implementations can be found where researchers have used more advanced computational methods and counting strategies such as youonly-look-once (YOLO) convolutional networks [25,26,63], outlier rejection based on cell size or fluorescence intensity and watershed segmentation to define cell borders [64][65][66] which can yield improvements and high accuracy in terms of resolving individual cells. In our case, making use of the high parallelization of our imaging, we only require an estimation of cell count over a population and not an absolute value on a per fish basis and so further counting methods have not been found necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequent question in digital cell counting is how a protocol rationalizes occluded cells or groups of cells with indistinguishable borders. Implementations can be found where researchers have used more advanced computational methods and counting strategies such as youonly-look-once (YOLO) convolutional networks [25,26,63], outlier rejection based on cell size or fluorescence intensity and watershed segmentation to define cell borders [64][65][66] which can yield improvements and high accuracy in terms of resolving individual cells. In our case, making use of the high parallelization of our imaging, we only require an estimation of cell count over a population and not an absolute value on a per fish basis and so further counting methods have not been found necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однако в большинстве работ, посвященных исследования форменных элементов крови методами статической цифровой микроскопии, в качестве препарата выступает не раствор нативной крови, а окрашенные мазки [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Такой подход позволяет определять лейкоцитарную формулу, а также количественное соотношение между форменными элементами различных типов, но не позволяет определять их концентрацию.…”
Section: автоматизация статической цифровой микроскопииunclassified