1990
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199003000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Survival of Autologous Adipose Tissue Taken and Transplanted by Different Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
119
1
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
119
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the choice was for the use of 10 ml syringe for aspiration, using this option was better when compared with the use of vacuum suction device 4 . According to the author, the vacuum pressure interferes significantly in the destruction of adipocytes and the level of absorption, and at 700 mmHg the lesion reaches 15% increase in absorption after grafting, however pressures of 250, 300, 500 mmHg damages the cell less than 2% 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, the choice was for the use of 10 ml syringe for aspiration, using this option was better when compared with the use of vacuum suction device 4 . According to the author, the vacuum pressure interferes significantly in the destruction of adipocytes and the level of absorption, and at 700 mmHg the lesion reaches 15% increase in absorption after grafting, however pressures of 250, 300, 500 mmHg damages the cell less than 2% 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Due to unpredictable resorption rate, fat autograft has the disadvantage of requiring a donor area and subjecting it to some local morbidity 4 . Despite the disadvantage, interest in fat grafting is large due to the nature autologous graft biocompatibility and absence of allergic reactions 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The published survival rates of FAG are divergent, ranging from 10 to 90% (Matsudo and Toledo, 1988;Nguyen et al, 1990;Pinski and Roenigk, 1992). The following questions remain unanswered (Goldwyn, 1988): Does the fat graft survive on the face?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, all of these techniques have serious disadvantages, especially shrinkage and foreign body reactions [3]. Reduction of adipose volume is thought to be partly related to insufficient vascularization of grafted fat tissue [4]. Fat tissue is highly vascularized with extensive capillary networks surrounding each adipocyte, and fat tissue itself has angiogenic properties [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%