2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10041543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Sound Transmission Losses of Sandwich Composite Double Panel Walls

Abstract: The increasing motivation behind the recently wide industrial applications of sandwich and composite double panel structures stems from their ability to absorb sounds more effectively. Meticulous selection of the geometrical and material constituents of both the core and panels of these structures can produce highly desirable properties. A good understanding of their vibro-acoustic response and emission index such as the sound transmission loss (STL) is, therefore, a requisite to producing optimal design. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(186 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various efforts to reduce the sound transmission through the wall are available in the literature [13][14][15]. However, strategies to improve the sound insulation of stud walls through perforated webs are yet to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various efforts to reduce the sound transmission through the wall are available in the literature [13][14][15]. However, strategies to improve the sound insulation of stud walls through perforated webs are yet to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TL is defined as the ratio of incident to transmitted sound power. There are a number of methods and publications for calculating the TL of FRP and sandwich structures, which are comprehensively reviewed by D’Alessandro et al [ 19 ] and by Isaac et al [ 20 ]. The studies of Dym and Lang [ 21 ] are of particular interest, as they describe the effects of skin thickness variation (and their ratio) and core stiffness variation in great detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their performance decays at low frequencies mainly due to the mass-air-mass resonance, where, in turn, an active control approach may be applied [ 32 , 33 ]. One of the advantages of a double-panel structure over a single panel is that its sound-absorbing performance can be improved, e.g., by interlayers and absorbing materials [ 34 , 35 ]. To improve structure performance around the mass-air-mass resonance, a mass-spring-damper system may be applied [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%