1971
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910080306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of RSV rescue from RSV‐transformed mammalian cells

Abstract: All individual heterokaryons obtained by fusion of cells of the five different mammalian RSV-transformed virogenic cells with indicator chicken fibroblasts produced infectious RSV. In contrast, non-virogenic mammalian cells derived from tumours which arose in mice injected with RSV did not give rise to infectious RSV, even when fused with chicken fibroblasts preinfected with three different "helper viruses". Fusion of four lines of vlrogenic cells with mammalian fibroblasts as well as of virogenic Chinese hams… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to this successful virus release from RBH cells, the rat TWERC cells could not be induced to release RSV subgroup C, This failure cannot be due to a lower fusion frequency of rat TWERC cells with loaded erythrocyte ghosts because in previous experiments with rat TWERC cells (vonder Helm et aI., 1980), we had found an even higher fusion frequency (50%) than with RBH cells; neither can it be due to an insufficient precursor cleavage since pr76 was cleaved as well in both RBH and TWERC cells upon fusion injection of p15, as shown in our previous work (vonder Helm et al, 1980). These results may reflect the fact that the TWERC cells are non-virogenic in contrast to RBH cells and corroborate the hypothesis that the virus in rat TWERC cells is not rescuable due to defects in the virus genome (Svoboda et aL, 1971).…”
Section: Of Infectious a S V B 77 Subgroup C After Fusion Injection Osupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to this successful virus release from RBH cells, the rat TWERC cells could not be induced to release RSV subgroup C, This failure cannot be due to a lower fusion frequency of rat TWERC cells with loaded erythrocyte ghosts because in previous experiments with rat TWERC cells (vonder Helm et aI., 1980), we had found an even higher fusion frequency (50%) than with RBH cells; neither can it be due to an insufficient precursor cleavage since pr76 was cleaved as well in both RBH and TWERC cells upon fusion injection of p15, as shown in our previous work (vonder Helm et al, 1980). These results may reflect the fact that the TWERC cells are non-virogenic in contrast to RBH cells and corroborate the hypothesis that the virus in rat TWERC cells is not rescuable due to defects in the virus genome (Svoboda et aL, 1971).…”
Section: Of Infectious a S V B 77 Subgroup C After Fusion Injection Osupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Mammalian cells are only non-productively infected and transformed by ASV, although minute amounts of virus group-specific antigen (gag) can be detected in the form of their precursor protein pr76 (Eisenman et al, 1974;Aupoix & Vigier, 1976). When such ASV-transformed mammalian cells were co-cultivated or fused with uninfected chicken embryo fibroblasts, virus is rescued and released (Svoboda & Hlozanek, 1970;Svoboda et al, 1971Svoboda et al, , 1977Steimer & Boettger, 1977), but the molecular mechanism of this process is not fully understood. The protein precursor pr76 is not detectably cleaved in ASVtransformed mammalian cells (Svoboda et al, 1977;von der Helm et al, 1980), presumably because no free protein p15 (the precursor of the virus protease that causes processing) is present.…”
Section: Fusion Injection Of Rous Sarcoma Virus Proteins Into Rous Samentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggested that the provirus is generated from a processed src mRNA because F6 and F6-NP had been established from rescued virus and therefore only RNA correctly spliced had been encapsidated. Previous attempts to obtain transforming virus after fusion of similar mouse (Svoboda et al, 1971) or rat (Hughes et al, 1978) cells with chick embryo fibroblasts infected by RAV-1 or transformation-defective avian sarcoma virus (ASV) mutants failed. This might be due to the experimental procedures used in which only free transforming virus in the supernatant of heterokaryons was measured.…”
Section: Analysis O F the Provirus In H-19 F6 And F6-npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, it is known that RSV-transformed rodent cells are not complemented when different independently obtained cell lines are fused one with the other (45). Similarly it was revealed that infection of transformed cells with rodent retroviruses does not lead to RSV rescue in spite of the fact that rodent retroviruses complete their replication cycle (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%