Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Mbarushimana, C.; Shahrabi, Alireza

doi:10.1109/ainaw.2007.123

Cited by 170 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, in maintaining up-to-date routing information, proactive protocols uninterruptedly employ a significant share of network capacity. This makes such routing protocols unsuitable for reconfigurable mobile ad-hoc networks [6] [7]. Additionally, further network capacity wastage occurs as the majority of stored routing information actually may never be used, and the node activity is fast and the variations in topology are more regular than the actual requests for route information.…”

Section: Proactive Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Study of Proactive, Reactive and Geographical MANET Routing Protocols

Abdulleh¹,

Yussof²,

Shaker³

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is defined as a combination of mobile nodes that lack a fixed infrastructure and is quickly deployable under any circumstances. These nodes have self-aware architecture and are able to move in multiple directions, which renders it dynamic topology. Its dynamicity makes routing in MANET rather challenging compared to fixed wired networks. This paper aims to perform a comparative study on the three categories of MANET routing protocol by comparing their characteristics and operations, as well as their strength and weaknesses.

show abstract

Section: Proactive Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hop-by-hop mechanism is utilized to forward packets, which is one of the main characteristics of any MANET routing protocol [6] [7]. Being a link-state routing algorithm, OLSR needs to keep up-to-date information about the nodes in the network and the route to each of these nodes.…”

Section: Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (Olsr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study of Proactive, Reactive and Geographical MANET Routing Protocols

Abdulleh¹,

Yussof²,

Shaker³

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A lot of simulation studies were carried out in the papers [4], [5], [6] to review both the qualitative and quantitative properties of various routing protocols. Based upon various observations done in [7], [8], [9] routing protocols must deal with limitations such as high error rates, scalability, multicasting, node cooperation and must be secure and energy efficient.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the Performance of Routing Protocols Using Quantitative Metrics in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Jagadeepak¹,

RAO²,

Devi³

2014

IJAREEIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Mobile ad hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes which are capable of exchanging information dynamically among themselves without the need of any fixed infrastructure. Inorder to transfer data among these mobile nodes, the process of routing is adopted, which makes use of a routing protocol inorder to select a path along the mobile nodes in the network, through which data packets are sent. Due to dynamic nature of mobile ad hoc networks, links setup between the mobile nodes break most frequently and hence a routing protocol must be efficient enough in handling such situations and should deliver better performance in every aspect. In this paper, the performance of three routing protocols AODV, DSDV and DSR has been analysed using Network Simulator-2. Their performance is evaluated using Quantitative metrics -packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, normalized routing load and jitter by varying node density and node mobility. The simulation results the routing protocol which gives better performance in various scenarios.

show abstract

“…In proactive protocols, all nodes have consistent and up-to-date permanent routing information for each node. Reactive protocols, by contrast, generate routes when demanded by the source node (Mbarushimana & Shahrabi, 2007). Hybrid protocols combine the advantages of proactive and reactive routing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved AODV route recovery in mobile ad-hoc networks using a genetic algorithm

Ahmad¹,

Sadeghzadeh²

2014

10.5267/j.msl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An important issue in ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocols is route failure caused by node mobility in the MANETs. The AODV requires a new route discovery procedure whenever a route breaks and these frequent route discoveries increase transmission delays and routing overhead. The present study proposes a new method for AODVs using a genetic algorithm to improve the route recovery mechanism. When failure occurs in a route, the proposed method (GAAODV) makes decisions regarding the QOS parameter to select source or local repair. The task of the genetic algorithm is to find an appropriate combination of weights to optimize end-to-end delay. This paper evaluates the metrics of routing overhead, average end-to-end delay, and packet delivery ratio. Comparison of the new algorithm and AODV (RFC 3561) using a NS-2 simulator shows that GAAODV obtains better results for the QOS parameters.

show abstract

Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Cited by 170 publications

References 5 publications

Comparative Study of Proactive, Reactive and Geographical MANET Routing Protocols

Comparative Study of Proactive, Reactive and Geographical MANET Routing Protocols

Investigating the Performance of Routing Protocols Using Quantitative Metrics in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Improved AODV route recovery in mobile ad-hoc networks using a genetic algorithm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About