2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.bio.20160401.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Rapid DNA Extraction Methods of Pathogenic Bacteria

Abstract: Abstract:Detection of pathogenic bacteria in food is most important for food safety and quality control, and the critical step it chooses the rapid, sensitive and more economical method to extract DNA to produce high quality and decrease the timeconsuming of measuring. Extraction of nucleic acids is the first step in most molecular biology studies and in all recombinant DNA techniques, but the difficult access steps and critical of analysis. Here we report, describe and compare the simple and fast methods of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA was extracted by the boiling method (Mandour et al ) from one cefotaxime‐resistant E. coli of each positive sample. Standard PCR was performed to screen for the presence of three ESBL gene families ( bla CTX‐M bla SHV and bla TEM ) using specific primer (Dallenne et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted by the boiling method (Mandour et al ) from one cefotaxime‐resistant E. coli of each positive sample. Standard PCR was performed to screen for the presence of three ESBL gene families ( bla CTX‐M bla SHV and bla TEM ) using specific primer (Dallenne et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted using the boiling method. 21 The PCRs were performed at a final volume of 25 mL using a green master mix (TSINGKE, China), and the products were visualized by agarose gel (1% w/v) electrophoresis (TSINGKE) stained with ethidium bromide (TSINGKE).…”
Section: Molecular Detection Of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes and Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cows in TYLO received once daily SC injection of 10 mg/kg mg tylosin (Tyloject® 20%, Razak Laboratories Co, Iran) for three days, at 21±3 days prior to calving and cows in MARB received single SC injection of 8 mg/kg SC marbofloxacin (Marbox®, Ceva Santé Animale BV, Netherlands) at 21±3 days prior to calving while cows assigned to CONT remained untreated nucA PCR. DNA extraction was performed by rapid boiling according to method by Abdelhai et al (47). Primers were selected on the basis of the published nucleotide sequence of the 613-bp nuc gene (F-CTG GCA TAT GTA TGG CAA TTG TT, R-TAT TGA CCT GAA TCA GCG TTG TCT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%