2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03351-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of PVD and CVD cutting tools performance in milling of duplex stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A thicker coating may not be ideal for finishing operations; however, for roughing operations, having a thicker coating may be beneficial. This conclusion was also drawn in other works [31,32].…”
Section: Coatings For Milling Toolssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A thicker coating may not be ideal for finishing operations; however, for roughing operations, having a thicker coating may be beneficial. This conclusion was also drawn in other works [31,32].…”
Section: Coatings For Milling Toolssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results report that the surface finish quality was better for the coated carbide end mill. Martinho et al [31] compared the behavior of identical carbide insert coated tools but provided with different coatings in the X2CrNiMoCu25-6-3-3 duplex stainless-steel facing. The coatings used were PVD (monolayer) AlTiN and CVD (multilayer) TiN/TiCN/Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Coatings For Milling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Figure 15b, it was identified that these fragments are parts of the inserts coating, indicating coating removal or detachment. This phenomenon has already been reported in similar works [43]. As represented in Figure 15a, small fragments retained in the chips have also been detected.…”
Section: Chip Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To understand the capabilities of the developed coatings, they must be properly characterized, as can be seen in studies carried out by several authors. It is important to determine some properties of coatings such as the thickness of the coating, usually assessed by SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) [9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] to determine the surface roughness of the obtained coatings, which can be done using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) method [9,10], or measure/qualify the level of adhesion between the coating and the substrate, which can be carried out using scratch tests, classifying the adhesion according to the BS EN 1071-3: 2005 standard [31], to evaluate the transmittance, which can be obtained using spectrophotometry, or to test the resistance to climate change following the PV1200 standard [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%