1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02648403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of pore structure evolution during solvent and thermal debinding of powder injection molded parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proper debinding process is necessary to avoid defect formation (Hwang and Hsieh 1996). Several debinding methods were tested on the 26 vol.% feedstock, as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Debindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper debinding process is necessary to avoid defect formation (Hwang and Hsieh 1996). Several debinding methods were tested on the 26 vol.% feedstock, as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Debindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the lack of binder movement control would lead to non-constrained particles, due to the decrease in the solid percentages at the surfaces, and a layer rich of binder could be formed; consequently, after debinding. In addition, other phenomena could occur such as the outward flow, where the binder sometimes; as a result of the high negative capillary pressure at these areas, tend to sweeps and fills all the contacts and fine pores [5]. The final stage- of the process is reached when binder decomposition occurs at the outer edges, which would lead to an increase of volume in large inter-particle pores; at the same time, another binder decomposition takes place at inter-particle contacts and fine pores, resulting in a somewhat smaller mean pore size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binder-assisted forming techniques are considered, nowadays, an important potential address of research in the area of powder processing. One of the most important techniques is the powder injection molding (PIM), which is based on using a closed die to form the powder into a desired shape using a thermoplastic polymeric material [1][2][3]; therefore, it is a combination of conventional plastic molding and powder metallurgy, which benefits from each in easy shaping and superior mechanical properties, respectively [4][5]. PIM, as a forming technique for high temperature alloys, has been paid great attention due to its high potential for producing complex shapes with large quantities and at low cost [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because 2n 1 r 1 ϭ 2n 2 r 2 ϭ L/2, where L is half the thickness of the specimen, the diffusion lengths obtained from Eq. [2] for coarse and fine powders are the same and are equal to и L/6. This finding indicates that the critical factor that determines the debinding time is the cross-section thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1] To understand the solvent rebinding behavior, Hwang and co-workers examined the microstructure evolution of powder injection molded (PIM) compacts and the interaction between the binder components and the solvent during debinding. [2,3] It was shown that pore channels develop and the average pore size increases as the debinding proceeds. These pore channels provide paths for the dissolved solution to diffuse out of the compact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%