2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of NF and RO membranes in the treatment of produced water—Part I: Assessing water quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An FO transport and structural parameter model [20] and containment rejection data collected during membrane exposure tests support the findings of this investigation. The results of this study can help guide future investigations on the performance and sustainability of polymeric membranes for produced water 3 and the modeled structural parameter (S) of the three membranes were determined using methodologies developed by Tiraferri et al [20]. The A, B, and S coefficients for each membrane were similar to those reported in our previous study [9], which employed membranes from the same casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An FO transport and structural parameter model [20] and containment rejection data collected during membrane exposure tests support the findings of this investigation. The results of this study can help guide future investigations on the performance and sustainability of polymeric membranes for produced water 3 and the modeled structural parameter (S) of the three membranes were determined using methodologies developed by Tiraferri et al [20]. The A, B, and S coefficients for each membrane were similar to those reported in our previous study [9], which employed membranes from the same casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is especially true in the oil and gas industry, where rapid oil field exploration has spurred the development of tight-barrier membrane processes for treatment of wastewaters like hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced waters [3][4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. While exceedingly higher total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in produced water has been a traditional hurdle for a variety of water treatment technologies, the prevalence of dissolved organic and aromatic compounds in oil field wastewaters has gained significant attention [16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results demonstrated that this technology could effectively meet water standards for polymer flooding and ensure stable oil production. Many researchers [18][19][20][21][22] purified produced water with various NF and RO membranes aiming for water reuse, confirming the feasibility of this technical process. Based on the facts above, it is highly expected to adopt NF to realize PFPW reuse for polymer flooding extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is well known that NF can effectively remove multivalent ions and high molecular weight organic compounds with lower operating pressure and higher permeate flux in comparison with RO. Thus, NF is a promising technology for advanced wastewater treatment considering its energy requirements and cost effectiveness, particularly when both NF and RO are suitable for wastewater reclamation (Alzahrani et al, 2013;Shahmansouri and Bellona, 2015). Despite these advantages, membrane fouling is still a key issue that hinders the application of membrane technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%