2010
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of neural network, fuzzy logic and linear transfer function techniques in daily rainfall‐runoff modelling under different input domains

Abstract: Abstract:This paper compares artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic (FL) and linear transfer function (LTF)-based approaches for daily rainfall-runoff modelling. This study also investigates the potential of Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model and the impact of antecedent soil moisture conditions in the performance of the daily rainfall-runoff models. Eleven different input vectors under four classes, i.e. (i) rainfall, (ii) rainfall and antecedent moisture content, (iii) rainfall and runoff and (iv) rainfall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that ARMA and K-Nearest-Neighbors (KNN) performed prediction better than ANN and its variants when the correlation between input and output was low. Lohani [11] compared ANN, FIS and linear transfer model for daily rainfall-runoff model under different input domains. The results showed that FIS outperformed linear model and ANN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that ARMA and K-Nearest-Neighbors (KNN) performed prediction better than ANN and its variants when the correlation between input and output was low. Lohani [11] compared ANN, FIS and linear transfer model for daily rainfall-runoff model under different input domains. The results showed that FIS outperformed linear model and ANN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of rainfall-runoff models can be found in the literature, varying from empirical models to highly sophisticated physical processes. Empirical models could be established based on statistical techniques (Brocca et al, 2011;Neal et al, 2013) or advanced machine learning algorithms (Lohani et al, 2011); such models can be effectively employed to analyze rainfall and runoff on the basis of historical time series data. In addition, physical-process models focus on simulating hydrological processes in a basin based on a set of mathematical equations governing physical processes of water flow and surfaces (Aronica et al, 2012;Chiew et al, 1993;Beven et al, 1984;Birkel et al, 2010;Grimaldi et al, 2013).…”
Section: A Review Of Related Work On Flood Susceptibility Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have shown that ARMA and KNearest-Neighbors (KNN) have performed prediction better than ANN and its variants when the correlation between input and output is low. Lohani [25] has compared ANN, FIS and linear transfer model for daily rainfall-runoff model under different input domains. The results illustrate that FIS has outperformed linear model and ANN.…”
Section: Co-published By Atlantis Press and Taylor And Francismentioning
confidence: 99%