1967
DOI: 10.1037/h0024467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of need satisfactions in military and business hierarchies.

Abstract: The lllenni11ger Fou11dalion, Topeka, Ka11JasThe Stouffer-Toby Role Conflict Scale, a measure of particularism (the value for institutionalized obligations or friendship), was administered to 230 employees in 13 bank branches in Mexico and the United States. Findings support the hypothesis that for both bank officers and line employees Mexicans are sig nificantly more particularistic than Mexican-Americans, who in turn are sig nificantly more particularistic than Anglo-Americans. The hypothesis that, by ethnic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the need-fulfilment measure, a pilot study in which the scale was administered individually to a comparable sample (which gave them an opportunity to comment on each item) revealed that they had no difficulty in understanding the various items. In addition, the fact that this scale has been used successfully in a variety of jobs and been found to relate highly to a number of relevant external criteria (Porter, 1962(Porter, , 1963Porter and Henry, 1964;Porter and Mitchell, 1967) suggests that it should be pretty valid in the present context. That the scale was simply used to obtain an overall score for each S is supported; by a recent factor analytic study (Herman and Hulin, 1973) which found that a single dimension, rather than five separate dimensions (for each of the needs covered by the scale) could best account for the score variance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As regards the need-fulfilment measure, a pilot study in which the scale was administered individually to a comparable sample (which gave them an opportunity to comment on each item) revealed that they had no difficulty in understanding the various items. In addition, the fact that this scale has been used successfully in a variety of jobs and been found to relate highly to a number of relevant external criteria (Porter, 1962(Porter, , 1963Porter and Henry, 1964;Porter and Mitchell, 1967) suggests that it should be pretty valid in the present context. That the scale was simply used to obtain an overall score for each S is supported; by a recent factor analytic study (Herman and Hulin, 1973) which found that a single dimension, rather than five separate dimensions (for each of the needs covered by the scale) could best account for the score variance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A measure of overall job satisfaction (rated on a 12-point bi-polar scale) was included t o determine which, if any, types of need satisfactions clustered with overall feelings about the job. Also, job grade was included as a variable since variations in need fulfillment patterns have been reported for different vertical positions in the organizational hierarchy (Mitchell, 1970;Porter, 1961 ;Porter, 1962;Porter and Mitchell, 1967;Rhinehart et al, 1969;Slocum, 1971).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have examined the relationship between this variable and employees' satisfaction with the work and the work context (cf. Browne and Neitzel 1952;Porter 1962;Porter and Mitchell 1967;Lichtman 1970;Herman and H u h 1973;Herman et al 1975). Since the results of these investigations have been thoroughly reviewed elsewhere (cf.…”
Section: Position Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%