2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of multiple machine learning algorithms for risk level prediction in goaf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the proposed system's performance encompassed seven parameters: accuracy, recall, specificity, precision or positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F score, and kappa which are defined as follows: 100 100 100 100 100 100 where TP, TN, FP, and FN denote true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative, respectively [ 67 ]. The kappa coefficient is an important index to evaluate the classification model [ 68 ]. Kappa can be calculated from a confusion matrix as: 100 where P o and P e obtained from: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the proposed system's performance encompassed seven parameters: accuracy, recall, specificity, precision or positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F score, and kappa which are defined as follows: 100 100 100 100 100 100 where TP, TN, FP, and FN denote true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative, respectively [ 67 ]. The kappa coefficient is an important index to evaluate the classification model [ 68 ]. Kappa can be calculated from a confusion matrix as: 100 where P o and P e obtained from: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of gob-side entry retaining (GER) technology provides technical support for the successful execution of deep continuous pressure relief mining and deep coal and gas mining. It achieves this by reducing the necessity for extensive roadway excavation, mitigating mining tension, enhancing resource recovery efficiency, eliminating stress concentration on coal pillars, and addressing the issue of gas accumulation in upper corners [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] ]. Over time, GER technology has been progressively applied across various coal seam thicknesses - from thin seams (less than 1.3 m) [ [7] , [8] , [9] ], medium-thick seams (1.3 m–3.5 m) [ [10] , [11] , [12] ], fully mechanized thick seams (more than 3.5 m) [ [13] , [14] , [15] ], to even fully mechanized top coal caving mining operations [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%