2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2006.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of microstructural characteristics and stored energy of mechanically activated hematite in different grinding environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the observations of Pourghahramani and Forssberg, Kaczmarek and Ninham, and Stewart et al [10,25,26].…”
Section: Microcrystalline Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees with the observations of Pourghahramani and Forssberg, Kaczmarek and Ninham, and Stewart et al [10,25,26].…”
Section: Microcrystalline Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results can be explained by the breaking of hematite, magnetite, and dolomite intergrowths in the composition of iron ore tailings. At the same time, the experiments with high-purity hematite [10] showed that after 9 h of milling in the planetary mill, 85% of the initial hematite was converted into amorphous phase. Similar results were obtained after 10 h of milling of hematite powder whose degree of crystallinity ranged from 9.37% to 49.8% [23].…”
Section: Amorphization Degreementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The XRD patterns of the samples were recorded in the range 2θ = 10-70 0 using a step size of 0.043 0 and a counting time of 107.4 s/step. Peak positions (2θ) and the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) area under peak (A) were obtained from the XRD spectra to characterize the microstructure such as crystallite size, D m using Scherrer equation, lattice strain, and degree of crystallinity (DOC), as shown in Equations 1 -3 respectively (Arbain et al, 2011;Pourghahramani and Forssberg, 2006a). The APD Version 4.1 g software was used to obtain these parameters, of which the (112), (204) and (312) planes were selected for the profile analysis (Palaniandy and Jamil, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%