2011 2nd International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT-2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccct.2011.6075196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of micro strip patch line feed and coaxial feed antenna design using genetic algorihms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four microstrip antennas are selected from Refs. [21][22][23][24], i.e., coaxial feeding microstrip antenna, U-shape groove antenna, linear gradient gap antenna and vivaldi antenna. The detailed dimensions and parameters of these antennas are presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four microstrip antennas are selected from Refs. [21][22][23][24], i.e., coaxial feeding microstrip antenna, U-shape groove antenna, linear gradient gap antenna and vivaldi antenna. The detailed dimensions and parameters of these antennas are presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a conventional array antenna, each radiation element is fed with a specific magnitude and phase of RF power from a corporate feed network, in which the main feed is split into a number of smaller RF feeding components . Such corporate network relies on a traveling wave along the transmission line and requires a number of quarter‐wavelength transformers, which oftentimes produce spurious undesirable radiation and give low antenna efficiency in addition to manufacturing complexity . On the other hand, such cumbersome power dividers can be eliminated in a feed network where a standing wave is formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%