1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(97)10114-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of methanol crossover across electropolymerized and commercial proton exchange membrane electrolytes for the acid direct methanol fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An optimum concentration of methanol was considered to be around 1±2 M methanol in water (around 6% methanol in water). A higher concentration as well as a higher temperature in the cell increases the diffusion of methanol through the membrane [127][128][129] and, thus, lowers the cell performance. An optimised anode will oxidise more methanol from the feed and the methanol available for cross-over decreases leaving another factor to optimise in the DMFC [130].…”
Section: Dmfc and Methanol Cross-overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimum concentration of methanol was considered to be around 1±2 M methanol in water (around 6% methanol in water). A higher concentration as well as a higher temperature in the cell increases the diffusion of methanol through the membrane [127][128][129] and, thus, lowers the cell performance. An optimised anode will oxidise more methanol from the feed and the methanol available for cross-over decreases leaving another factor to optimise in the DMFC [130].…”
Section: Dmfc and Methanol Cross-overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the conditions required for an electrode material working as a cathode in a direct alcohol fuel cell (DAFC) due to the fuel crossover effect. [19][20][21][22][23] As it is well known, this process of ORR tolerance is not sustained on platinum-based cathodes in presence of methanol. [20,[24][25][26][27][28] This is the reason why electrocatalysts based on a non-platinum material-or better on non-precious metals-have to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7), J i is flux of alcohols, D i is diffusion coefficient, L is membrane thickness (0.18 mm thickness), C bulk is anode side concentration of alcohols (2 M), and C vac is cathode side concentration of alcohols [12]. It was assumed C vac = 0 because cathode side was sweeped by oxygen gas [13]. Figure 3 showed the diffusion coefficients, which was calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%