Comparative study of mediation practices in European countries

Abstract

The article «A Comparative Study of Mediation Practices in European Countries» is an analytical review of the effectiveness and features of mediation in the context of different European countries. The authors conduct a comparative analysis of mediation practices in the selected countries, identifying similarities, differences and successful methods, used in conflict resolution. Using case studies from different countries, the article examines aspects, such as mediator selection, procedures, consent practices and enforcement.
 The results of the use of mediation in various fields, including family, commercial and socio-political conflicts, are discussed. The authors note the positive impact of mediation on social relations, reducing the workload of judges and increasing confidence in the justice system.
 The article provides an in-depth analysis of the effectiveness and features of mediation in the context of different European countries. The article focuses on the structure and organization of mediation processes in different European countries. Case studies are used to examine such aspects as the selection of mediators, mediation procedures, and the importance of the parties' consent.
 The analysis emphasizes the positive effects of mediation, such as improving social relations, reducing the burden on the judicial system, and building confidence in dispute resolution mechanisms.
 The article also emphasizes the importance of comparative study of mediation practices in European countries in order to enrich the experience and develop more effective methods of conflict resolution. The results of this study are relevant both for mediation professionals and for legislators and decision-makers seeking to optimize mediation practice in their countries.