Intelligent System and Computing 2020
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Interval Type-2 and Type-1 Fuzzy Genetic and Flower Pollination Algorithms in Optimization of Fuzzy Fractional Order PIλDμ Controllers

Abstract: In this chapter, a comparison between fuzzy genetic optimization algorithm (FGOA) and fuzzy flower pollination optimization algorithm (FFPOA) is bestowed. In extension, the prime parameters of each algorithm adapted using interval type-2 and type-1 fuzzy logic system (FLS) are presented. The key feature of type-2 fuzzy system is alimenting the modeling uncertainty to the algorithms, and hence it is a prime motivation of using interval type-2 fuzzy systems for dynamic parameter adaption. These fuzzy algorithms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Optimizing IT2FL with the FPA using the basic linguistic information, would offer an effective decisions [36,37]. The FPA parameters and values used include; number of generation = 1000, population size = 100, ∈ = 0.8, = 0.1, and = 1.5.…”
Section: Fpa-optimization Of It2fl For Telemedical Monitoring and Prediction Of Cardiac Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Optimizing IT2FL with the FPA using the basic linguistic information, would offer an effective decisions [36,37]. The FPA parameters and values used include; number of generation = 1000, population size = 100, ∈ = 0.8, = 0.1, and = 1.5.…”
Section: Fpa-optimization Of It2fl For Telemedical Monitoring and Prediction Of Cardiac Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature-based metaheuristic algorithms were used to optimize the type-1 fuzzy logic controllers for fault-tolerant control application in chemical process application (i.e. nonlinear level control process) depicted in Patel and Shah (2020) with statistical results and fault recovery time analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reference to Priyadarshi et al (2018) and Templos-Santos and Aguilar-Mejia (2019), FPA is used in engineering problems, like maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of pumping system govern by photovoltaic energy, permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) speed control using conventional PI controller. Also in Patel et al (2020a), fuzzy FPA is used to control dihybrid level control system under the external disturbances. In recent, FPA algorithm proves capability in renewable energy sector application, the FPA is used for MPPT using innovative wave energy converter system (Zhao et al , 2019; Sun et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPA algorithm is used for optimization engineering and non-engineering problem (Priyadarshi et al , 2018; Templos-Santos and Aguilar-Mejia, 2019; Patel et al , 2020a; Zhao et al , 2019; Sun et al , 2018; Jain et al , 2018), however, the use of the metaheuristic algorithm in fault-tolerant control (FTC) applications is novel and proposed in the article, in addition, the metaheuristic FPA is used to design adaptive parameterization of type-1 fuzzy controller membership functions (MFs) for process control benchmark control problem with uncertainties. In recent (Priyadarshi et al , 2018; Templos-Santos and Aguilar-Mejia, 2019; Patel et al , 2020a; Lagunes et al ., 2018a, b; Bernal et al , 2019; Patel and Shah, 2022a, b; Patel, 2021), various metaheuristic algorithms are used to optimize fuzzy controllers for different engineering applications but due to advantages of the FPA (i.e. fewer parameters for tuning, random flight based algorithm, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%