2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1224-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and parasitological culture for the diagnosis of canine leishmaniosis

Abstract: BackgroundThe establishment of an accurate diagnostic protocol for canine visceral leishmaniosis (CanL) is a significant laboratory challenge and the lack of a reliable reference standard is one of the major problems. The aim of this study was to compare in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and parasitological culture (PC) for detection of L. infantum in skin, spleen, lymph node and bone marrow of clinically healthy and sick seropositive dogs.FindingsThe study included 65 dogs positive with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
4
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This lower sensitivity of in situ hybridization compared with PCR is due to the fact that there is no amplification of parasite DNA in this technique as in PCR, but rather a detection of nucleic acids in the sample [11,14]. Nonetheless, the main advantages of in situ hybridization compared with PCR are the abilities to diagnose active infections and allow for the correlation between the presence of the parasite and the lesion [35]. In addition, PCR may have inaccuracies in sensitivity, especially in FFPE tissues [8,9], and a combination with a parasitological or histological technique is recommended to increase accuracy in the diagnosis of human NWCL [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower sensitivity of in situ hybridization compared with PCR is due to the fact that there is no amplification of parasite DNA in this technique as in PCR, but rather a detection of nucleic acids in the sample [11,14]. Nonetheless, the main advantages of in situ hybridization compared with PCR are the abilities to diagnose active infections and allow for the correlation between the presence of the parasite and the lesion [35]. In addition, PCR may have inaccuracies in sensitivity, especially in FFPE tissues [8,9], and a combination with a parasitological or histological technique is recommended to increase accuracy in the diagnosis of human NWCL [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…amastigotes in the pancreas observed in the present study was slightly lower than the frequency of 22.6% reported by Guerra et al [ 15 ] using IHC. However, this frequency was much lower than that obtained by IHC in other organs of dogs that tested seropositive for anti- L. infantum antibodies by TR DPP® and ELISA, such as spleen (78.79 to 81.5%), bone marrow (64.6%), liver (73.6%), lymph node (76.9 to 81.5%), skin (45.6 to 65.4%), and genital tract (85.0 to 90.0%) [ 15 , 26 , 31 ]. Unlike organs of the mononuclear phagocyte system, skin, and genital tract, these results suggest the absence of tropism of L. infantum for the pancreas [ 15 , 26 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this frequency was much lower than that obtained by IHC in other organs of dogs that tested seropositive for anti- L. infantum antibodies by TR DPP® and ELISA, such as spleen (78.79 to 81.5%), bone marrow (64.6%), liver (73.6%), lymph node (76.9 to 81.5%), skin (45.6 to 65.4%), and genital tract (85.0 to 90.0%) [ 15 , 26 , 31 ]. Unlike organs of the mononuclear phagocyte system, skin, and genital tract, these results suggest the absence of tropism of L. infantum for the pancreas [ 15 , 26 , 31 ]. On the other hand, the frequency of pancreatic infection might be higher than that found in this study since the sensitivity of IHC for the diagnosis of L. infantum infection in tissues of dogs is lower than that of the polymerase chain reaction [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Brasil, a LV é considerada uma doença endêmica e encontra-se em franca expansão geográfica, o que caracteriza sua urbanização e uma mudança em seu perfil de transmissão, antes restrito a áreas rurais. Como consequência deste processo, o relato de surtos em centros urbanos é cada vez mais frequente, como descrito em estudos nos estados de Pernambuco, São Paulo, Maranhão e Rio de Janeiro (Dantas-Torres, Brandão-Filho, 2006;Silva et al, 2008;D'Andrea et al, 2015;Furtado et al, 2015;).…”
Section: Aspectos Geraisunclassified