2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Hangingwall Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure also shows that the dataset was quite widely distributed and the distribution of most variables was not symmetric. Therefore, normalising all variables into [0, 1] range based on their corresponding minimum and maximum values may improve the computation efficiency of classifiers …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure also shows that the dataset was quite widely distributed and the distribution of most variables was not symmetric. Therefore, normalising all variables into [0, 1] range based on their corresponding minimum and maximum values may improve the computation efficiency of classifiers …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training set is used to build classifiers, while the testing set is used to verify their predictive performance. In AI, the percentage of the training set to the whole dataset needs to be determined by an optimisation analysis to obtain a representative training set . In this paper, 70% of the whole dataset (58 unstable slopes and 59 stable slopes) was included in the training set, and the remaining 30% (26 unstable slopes and 25 stable slopes) was included in the testing set after the optimisation analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations