2015
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2015.67060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Global Seismicity on the Hot Engine Belt and the Cooling Seismic Belt—Improvement on Research Ideas of Earthquake Prediction

Abstract: The study in this paper analyzes and compares the distribution on the global engine active seismic zone and cooling seismic belt basing on the ANSS earthquake catalog from Northern California Earthquake Data Center. An idea of the seismogenesis and earthquake prediction research is achieved by showing the stratigraphic structure in the hot engine belt. The results show that the main engine and its seismic cones are the global seismic activity area, as well as the subject of global geological disaster. Based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subcrustal earthquake activity in the Aegean Sea area from January 1, 2009 to October 1, 2015 is shown in Figure 12. The figure indicates that seismic activity of the Volcano arc block, which was dense seismic at both ends of the Volcano arc, and the red earthquakes under 500 km depth below constituting a super active layer [5] opening to the northwest, was significantly higher than that of the Greek arc block. The earthquake focal depth sequence of the Aegean Sea from January 1, 2008 to October 1, 2015 is shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Seismogenic Process Before the Earthquake Mw69 On May 24 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The subcrustal earthquake activity in the Aegean Sea area from January 1, 2009 to October 1, 2015 is shown in Figure 12. The figure indicates that seismic activity of the Volcano arc block, which was dense seismic at both ends of the Volcano arc, and the red earthquakes under 500 km depth below constituting a super active layer [5] opening to the northwest, was significantly higher than that of the Greek arc block. The earthquake focal depth sequence of the Aegean Sea from January 1, 2008 to October 1, 2015 is shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Seismogenic Process Before the Earthquake Mw69 On May 24 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The method in this paper takes the study of intracrustal structure system as the evidence of testifying the subcrustal seismic activity areas. As for intracrustal strong earthquake, structure system is the key to the occurring of strong earthquake in the intensive areas of subcrustal seismic activity [5] [19].…”
Section: Study On the Intracrustal Structure Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been believed that seismic energy mainly depends on the strain energy accumulation of crustal tectonic movement; however, in the world, more than 95% of intracrustal strong earthquakes and more than 85% of active volcanoes happen within the twenty four seismic cones [5], suggesting that there is a close relationship between intracrustal strong earthquake and seismic activity in the deep. One could conclude that the energy of intracrustal strong earthquake may mainly come from deep energy supply, and the strain energy accumulation of crustal tectonic movement may function as a complement and reinforcement.…”
Section: Energy Source Of Intracrustal Strong Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous 34 hours, a 6.4 magnitude quake had struck 11km to the northwest. The author thought that, if only within the scope of around 50 km and the strike-slip properties of fault to discuss the cause of the earthquake (USGS, 2019) has great limitations, should be based on the principle of Seismo-Geothermic Theory (Chen, 2000(Chen, , 2012a(Chen, , 2013aChen et al, 2013) and it's working methods (Chen, 2013b(Chen, , 2015a(Chen, , 2015b(Chen, , 2015c(Chen, , 2016a(Chen, , 2016b(Chen, , 2016c(Chen, , 2016dChen et al, 2015aChen et al, , 2015b, must study the seismic cone tectonic of the west coast of the United States and the relationship with the San Andreas Fault, and open up a new direction for the future of earthquake prediction research (Chen, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%