1987
DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(87)90080-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of fracture gap motion in external fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomechanical tests were performed in order to determine the right montage configuration 13,14,15,16,17,18,19 . …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical tests were performed in order to determine the right montage configuration 13,14,15,16,17,18,19 . …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the movement between fragments is to be controlled to achieve an optimal mechanical environment within the fracture gap, both the fixation stiffness and the bony loading have to be known. Numerous stiffnesses of fixation devices have been reported in the literature (Lippert and Hirsch, 1974;Kristiansen et al, 1987;Goodship et al, 1988;Cunningham et al, 1989;Hoffmann et al, 1991;Kenwright et al, 1991;Goodship et al, 1993). However, only few studies specify more than axial or bending stiffness values (Hoffmann et al,199 1).…”
Section: Fixation Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%