2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1666895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Four Shadow Band Diffuse Irradiance Correction Algorithms for Almerı´a, Spain

Abstract: Diffuse irradiance is a fundamental component in solar resource considerations. Diffuse irradiance can be accurately determined by calculation from global and beam normal (direct) measurements. However, beam solar measurements can be expensive and therefore shadow bands are often used along with pyranometers to mask the solar disk. The errors that result from the use shadow bands are well known and have been studied by numerous authors. The thrust of this article is to examine four recognized correction techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the CM3 under the shadowband were adjusted to represent all-sky diffuse radiation using the method of Muneer and Zhang (2002), reported as the most accurate of four commonly used algorithms when assessed using data from Spain (Lopez et al, 2004b), Israel and the UK (Lopez et al, 2004a). These data correlated well with the BF3 diffuse measurement (r = 0.99), but the BF3 overestimated by 10.7% and was therefore corrected by dividing by 1.107 before modelling.…”
Section: Appendix C Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the CM3 under the shadowband were adjusted to represent all-sky diffuse radiation using the method of Muneer and Zhang (2002), reported as the most accurate of four commonly used algorithms when assessed using data from Spain (Lopez et al, 2004b), Israel and the UK (Lopez et al, 2004a). These data correlated well with the BF3 diffuse measurement (r = 0.99), but the BF3 overestimated by 10.7% and was therefore corrected by dividing by 1.107 before modelling.…”
Section: Appendix C Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shadow band for R S had a radius and width of 318 and 75 mm, respectively, and the shadow band for PAR had a radius and width of 80 and 13 mm, respectively. The shadow bands were adjusted each week for solar declination and corrected for diffuse irradiance obscured by the shadow band using the method of Muneer and Zhang (2002), which was found to have less error across a wide range of sky conditions than three other commonly used methods (López et al, 2004). Direct beam components were derived as the difference between the total and diffuse components, and the NIR wavelengths were derived as the difference between the global and PAR wavelengths.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] For the particular case of total solar diffuse radiation measured by pyranometers, i.e., diffuse radiation spectrally integrated throughout the whole solar interval (0.285-2.800 mm), several authors have proposed different correction models [Drummond, 1956;Steven, 1984;LeBaron et al, 1990;Batlles et al, 1995;Muneer and Zhang, 2002]. These models have been validated by comparison with experimental measurements at different locations [López et al, 2004a[López et al, , 2004bKudish and Evseev, 2008;Sánchez et al, 2012] and are widely accepted to provide accurate and reliable total solar irradiance values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%