2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-019-1991-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of energy and footprint minimization limit for two types of graphene-assisted ring-shape modulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simplify the simulation procedure but without losing any accuracy, both layers of graphene and the alumina one are replaced by a homogeneous waveguide, with the refraction index n homog given as n homog = n Si + α(µ, λ) + jβ(µ, λ) and ne f f graphene = ne f f homog , where α(µ, λ) and β(µ, λ) are the real and imaginary parts of the silicon refractive index being a function of the wavelength and chemical potential, respectively. Here, n Si is the silicon refractive index, and ne f f homog and ne f f graphene are the effective refraction index of the homogeneous and graphene-assisted waveguides, respectively [78]. In particular, this method renders a homogeneous waveguide instead of a classical heterogeneous waveguide with many layers, and consequently, several different indexes of refraction, with an estimated error of ∼0.05% only.…”
Section: Design Optimization and Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To simplify the simulation procedure but without losing any accuracy, both layers of graphene and the alumina one are replaced by a homogeneous waveguide, with the refraction index n homog given as n homog = n Si + α(µ, λ) + jβ(µ, λ) and ne f f graphene = ne f f homog , where α(µ, λ) and β(µ, λ) are the real and imaginary parts of the silicon refractive index being a function of the wavelength and chemical potential, respectively. Here, n Si is the silicon refractive index, and ne f f homog and ne f f graphene are the effective refraction index of the homogeneous and graphene-assisted waveguides, respectively [78]. In particular, this method renders a homogeneous waveguide instead of a classical heterogeneous waveguide with many layers, and consequently, several different indexes of refraction, with an estimated error of ∼0.05% only.…”
Section: Design Optimization and Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first graphene-based electro-absorption modulator was demonstrated in 2011 [74]. Since then, several graphene integrated modulators have been proposed [70][71][72][74][75][76][77][78]. Graphene-based modulators have already demonstrate their ability to outperform traditional modulators, but there is still plenty of room for optimization [68,72,[78][79][80][81].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optical modulators based on graphene have outperformed traditional modulators in terms of the bandwidth, power consumption, and footprint. For example, several works have addressed the performance of graphene-based modulators [9,14,22,24,28]. However, they still have room for performance improvements, especially in the power consumption, bandwidth, and footprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%