2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.085440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of electronic and magnetic properties of iron and cobalt phthalocyanine molecules physisorbed on two-dimensional MoS2 and graphene

Abstract: In this paper, we have done a comparative study of electronic and magnetic properties of iron phthalocyanine (FePc) and cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) molecules physisorbed on monolayer of MoS2 and graphene by using density functional theory. Various different types of physisorption sites have been considered for both surfaces. Our calculations reveal that the M Pc molecules prefer the S-top position on MoS2. However, on graphene, FePc molecule prefers the bridge position while CoPc molecule prefers the top posi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption of activated FePc (E ad (2) ) is presented (see eq 5) in the main text. Our findings concerning the role of vdW interactions agree to large extent with the recent studies of other authors 42,56,68 dealing with the MPcs on 2D substrates. For example, PBE+U +TS calculations by Haldar et al 56 for flat adsorption of the FePc in three different positions above the graphene plane − Top, Bridge, and Hex − give the absorption energies of −3.38, −3.40, and −3.36 eV, respectively.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adsorption of activated FePc (E ad (2) ) is presented (see eq 5) in the main text. Our findings concerning the role of vdW interactions agree to large extent with the recent studies of other authors 42,56,68 dealing with the MPcs on 2D substrates. For example, PBE+U +TS calculations by Haldar et al 56 for flat adsorption of the FePc in three different positions above the graphene plane − Top, Bridge, and Hex − give the absorption energies of −3.38, −3.40, and −3.36 eV, respectively.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Having in mind the results of our recent studies 67 and also recent papers on similar hybrid structures involving TMPc and graphene, 42,56,68 we have performed some calculations, for the systems studied in the present work, employing vdW corrections within the Grimme and Tkatchenko−Scheffler schemes to the standard PBE. We indicate these approaches as PBE, PBE+D2, and PBE+T-S, and they seem to be commonly used in the studies of the dispersive force effects.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hamiltonian written above describes the relation between magnetic energy and the orientation of individual spins with respect to their environment, or in the other words, the MAE of the system. In the case of organometallic structures the performance of conventional DFT methods in accurate prediction of the MAE is rather poor [52][53][54] mainly due to the static correlation error 55 . The discrepancy between DFT prediction and the experiment for G-FePc composites can even reach one order of magnitude 42 .…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of G-fepc Hybrid Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), such as the GW formalism [21][22][23] , has been very successful [24][25][26] in resolving the gap problem of DFT 27,28 , its relatively high computational cost hinders its routine applications in large systems such as the interfaces formed between (metallo)phthalocyanines and monolayer TMDs. As a result, most prior computational studies of the phthalocyanine:TMD interfaces still employ DFT, with different complexities such as semi-local functionals 17,29 , hybrid functionals 3,30 or the DFT+U approach 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%