2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00365-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of different fluorescent dyes for the detection of proteins on membranes using the peroxyoxalate chemiluminescent reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2C). This sensitivity is significantly higher than the maximum sensitivity obtained with the reaction chamber previously developed in our laboratory [24]. However, considering the continuous replacement of the chemiluminescent reagents that occurs in the reaction chamber containing the blot, we expected a much higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2C). This sensitivity is significantly higher than the maximum sensitivity obtained with the reaction chamber previously developed in our laboratory [24]. However, considering the continuous replacement of the chemiluminescent reagents that occurs in the reaction chamber containing the blot, we expected a much higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As indicated in Section 1, it has been previously shown in our laboratory [23,24] that MDPF-labeled proteins can be chemiexcited by the high energy intermediates produced in the TCPO-H 2 O 2 reaction in acetone. Here, we have investigated whether it is possible to increase the sensitivity of this chemiluminescent method by a continuous renewing of the chemiluminescent reagents in the specially designed cells described in Section 2.3 ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To eliminate the risk of missing or misrepresenting levels of proteins that do not blot well, Smejkal et al [13] developed a CL-based method which directly immunodetected proteins in agarose gels by conventional antibodybased procedures, and not on electroblots. In addition, CL detection of total protein profiles has also been reported [14,15], which is based on the CL signals from proteins labeled with the fluorescent reagent 2-methoxy-2,4-diphenyl-3(2H)-fluranone (MDPF), but the procedure of electroblotting to PVDF membranes cannot be eliminated. Because of the high cost of antibodies and the risk of missing proteins during transferring procedures, it is of great importance to develop new methods to detect proteins without transfer and immunoreaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%