2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of different desiccant wheel designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The air temperature required for the regeneration of the desiccant is approximately 60-80 • C (Maclaine-Cross and Banks 1972;Jurinak 1982;Lowenstein, Slayzak, and Kozubal 2006;Ge, Ziegler, and Wang 2010;Narayanan et al 2011), so conventional gas-fired burners or HCs are commonly used to heat the regeneration air. Unfortunately, some of this regeneration heat is transferred to the supply air side, which makes additional cooling of the process air Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 23:15 12 April 2015 necessary.…”
Section: Solid Desiccant Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air temperature required for the regeneration of the desiccant is approximately 60-80 • C (Maclaine-Cross and Banks 1972;Jurinak 1982;Lowenstein, Slayzak, and Kozubal 2006;Ge, Ziegler, and Wang 2010;Narayanan et al 2011), so conventional gas-fired burners or HCs are commonly used to heat the regeneration air. Unfortunately, some of this regeneration heat is transferred to the supply air side, which makes additional cooling of the process air Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 23:15 12 April 2015 necessary.…”
Section: Solid Desiccant Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8(b) and (c). The wheel is divided into four portions; therefore, only a quarter of the wheel is undergoing the dehumidification process (with another quarter undergoing the regeneration process) at any given time [24]. The total adsorption rate of the packed bed and fluidized bed systems in one hour (kg/h) can be obtained by the average adsorption rate (g/s) at the 5-min point (Fig.…”
Section: System Stability Under Continuous Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compound desiccant wheel was found to have a better performance in a climate with moderate temperatures or in a climate with a high humidity ratio. Narayanan et al 18 developed a one dimensional transient gas and solid side resistance model and compared the performance of different desiccant wheel designs (parallel flow, counter flow, and additional axial cooling). They found counter flow desiccant wheel had much better dehumidification performance than parallel flow and the counter flow with axial cooling improved the dehumidification performance considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%