2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of chlorhexidine dressings versus simple gauze dressings in midline laparotomy wound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both groups show significant reduction in periwound edema, difference between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Table 3). Gandhi et al, 2016, in his study to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressing with traditional gauze dressing found that there is decreased incidence of fever and frequency of infection in chlorhexidine dressings [8]. The frequency with which the dressing had to be changed was also reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both groups show significant reduction in periwound edema, difference between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Table 3). Gandhi et al, 2016, in his study to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressing with traditional gauze dressing found that there is decreased incidence of fever and frequency of infection in chlorhexidine dressings [8]. The frequency with which the dressing had to be changed was also reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%